Compare/Iseki SX75 vs Iseki TG6675

Iseki SX75 vs Iseki TG6675

Verdict: Iseki SX75 vs Iseki TG6675

The Iseki SX75 and the Iseki TG6675 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Iseki SX75 leads on rated power with 70 hp against 65 hp. Iseki TG6675 is the lighter machine (4,255 kg vs 6,856 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Iseki SX75 holds more fuel (85.2 L vs 53.0 L) for longer stints between fills. Iseki TG6675 is the newer design (2019 vs 1985). In short: choose the Iseki SX75 for outright pulling power, or the Iseki TG6675 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Iseki

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Iseki

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

70 hp

65 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

IsekiReference

liquid-cooledReference

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Engine

ROPS Fuel tank

85.2 LReference

—

Cab Fuel tank

104.8 LReference

—

Engine

52.2 kWReference

—

Displacement

3.9 LReference

2.2 LReference

Bore/Stroke

102 x 118 mmReference

84 x 100 mmReference

Power

52.2 kWReference

—

Fuel system

direct injectionReference

—

Air cleaner

dual dry elementReference

—

Pre-heating

glow plugsReference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

2600Reference

Starter

electricReference

Starter volts

12Reference

Fuel tank

—

53.0 LReference

Engine (gross)

—

48.5 kWReference

Power (gross)

—

48.5 kWReference

Transmission

Type

syncromeshReference

power shuttleReference

Gears

24 forward and 8 reverseReference

12 forward and reverseReference

Transmission

Super ShiftReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

Pump flow

50.0 lpmReference

70.8 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

IReference

Control

position and draft controlReference

position controlReference

Rear lift

3099 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

330.2mm dry discReference

—

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

540/750Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2000Reference

—

Valves

—

2Reference

Rear lift (at ends)

—

1579 kgReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

1399 kgReference

Mid PTO

—

independentReference

Mid PTO Type

—

2000Reference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

223 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

225 cmReference

—

Weight

6856 to 8003 poundsReference

4255 to 4608 poundsReference

Front tire

10.00-16Reference

9.5-16Reference

2WD Rear tire

18.4-30Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 18.4-30Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 18.4-30Reference

—

Length

388 cmReference

343 cmReference

Height (exhaust)

264 cmReference

—

Ground clearance

38 cmReference

25 cmReference

2WD Front tread

141 to 184 cmReference

—

4WD Front tread

146 to 198 cmReference

—

Rear tread

140 to 200 cmReference

—

2WD ROPS

3109 kgReference

—

2WD Cab

3410 kgReference

—

4WD Cab

3630 kgReference

—

Wheelbase

—

198 cmReference

Rear tire

—

13.6-28Reference

Ag front

—

9.5-16Reference

Ag rear

—

13.6-28Reference

Width

—

172 cmReference

Height (ROPS)

—

264 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

233 cmReference

ROPS Weight

—

1930 kgReference

Cab Weight

—

2090 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Battery AH

110Reference

—

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.