Compare/Iseki SX95 vs Iseki T9000

Iseki SX95 vs Iseki T9000

Verdict: Iseki SX95 vs Iseki T9000

The Iseki SX95 and the Iseki T9000 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Iseki SX95 leads on rated power with 95 hp against 89 hp. Iseki T9000 is the lighter machine (6,404 kg vs 7,937 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Iseki SX95 holds more fuel (115.1 L vs 79.9 L) for longer stints between fills. Iseki SX95 is the newer design (1985 vs 1982). In short: choose the Iseki SX95 for outright pulling power, or the Iseki T9000 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Iseki

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Iseki

Fit score

Clear

Rated power

95 hp

89 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

IsekiReference

liquid-cooledReference

Image courtesy of Phillip MarshReference

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Engine

ROPS Fuel tank

115.1 LReference

—

Cab Fuel tank

135.1 LReference

—

Engine

70.8 kWReference

66.2 kWReference

Displacement

5.4 LReference

Bore/Stroke

102 x 110 mmReference

Power

70.8 kWReference

66.2 kWReference

Fuel system

direct injectionReference

—

Air cleaner

dual dry elementReference

dry with pre-cleanerReference

Pre-heating

glow plugsReference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Fuel tank

—

79.9 LReference

Compression

—

17.5:1Reference

Starter power

—

2.0 kWReference

Coolant capacity

—

18.3 LReference

Transmission

Type

syncromeshReference

gearReference

Gears

24 forward and 8 reverseReference

16 forward and 4 reverseReference

Transmission

Super ShiftReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

Pump flow

50.0 lpmReference

43.5 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

Control

position and draft controlReference

Rear lift

3099 kgReference

2399 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

330.2mm dry discReference

333mm dry discReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

540/1000Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2000Reference

1000@2050Reference

Valves

—

1Reference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

250 cmReference

231 cmReference

4WD Wheelbase

252 cmReference

235 cmReference

Weight

7937 to 9039 poundsReference

6404 to 6757 poundsReference

Front tire

10.00-16Reference

7.50x20Reference

2WD Rear tire

18.4-34Reference

16.9x34Reference

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 18.4-34Reference

Front: 7.50x20. Rear: 16.9x34Reference

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 12.4-24. Rear: 18.4-34Reference

Front: 11.2x24. Rear: 16.9x34Reference

Length

426 cmReference

398 cmReference

Height (exhaust)

266 cmReference

—

Ground clearance

42 cmReference

35 cmReference

2WD Front tread

141 to 192 cmReference

132 to 182 cmReference

4WD Front tread

146 to 198 cmReference

146/155 cmReference

Rear tread

140 to 217 cmReference

140 to 189 cmReference

2WD ROPS

3600 kgReference

—

2WD Cab

3900 kgReference

—

4WD ROPS

3870 kgReference

—

4WD Cab

4100 kgReference

—

Width

—

194 cmReference

Height

—

259 cmReference

2WD Weight

—

2904 kgReference

4WD Weight

—

3064 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Battery AH

170Reference

80Reference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Charging amps

—

35Reference

Batteries

—

2Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.