Compare/Iseki SX95 vs Iseki TJW95

Iseki SX95 vs Iseki TJW95

Verdict: Iseki SX95 vs Iseki TJW95

The Iseki SX95 and the Iseki TJW95 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Iseki TJW95 leads on rated power with 99 hp against 95 hp. Iseki TJW95 is the lighter machine (3,845 kg vs 7,937 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Iseki TJW95 holds more fuel (180.2 L vs 115.1 L) for longer stints between fills. Iseki TJW95 is the newer design (2008 vs 1985). In short: choose the Iseki TJW95 for outright pulling power, or the Iseki SX95 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Iseki

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Iseki

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

95 hp

99 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

IsekiReference

liquid-cooledReference

Differential lock

—

automatic standardReference

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

ROPS Fuel tank

115.1 LReference

—

Cab Fuel tank

135.1 LReference

—

Engine

70.8 kWReference

74.0 kWReference

Displacement

5.4 LReference

4.4 LReference

Bore/Stroke

102 x 110 mmReference

—

Power

70.8 kWReference

74.0 kWReference

Fuel system

direct injectionReference

—

Air cleaner

dual dry elementReference

—

Pre-heating

glow plugsReference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

—

Fuel tank

—

180.2 LReference

Starter type

—

electricReference

Transmission

Type

syncromeshReference

—

Gears

24 forward and 8 reverseReference

24 forward and reverseReference

Transmission

Super ShiftReference

AT ShiftReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Pump flow

50.0 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIReference

2Reference

Control

position and draft controlReference

—

Rear lift

3099 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

—

Clutch

330.2mm dry discReference

—

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

540/750/1000Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2000Reference

—

Valves

—

2 to 4Reference

Total flow

—

65.9 lpmReference

Rear lift (at ends)

—

4399 kgReference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

250 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

252 cmReference

—

Weight

7937 to 9039 poundsReference

3845 kgReference

Front tire

10.00-16Reference

9.5R24Reference

2WD Rear tire

18.4-34Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 18.4-34Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 12.4-24. Rear: 18.4-34Reference

—

Length

426 cmReference

414 cmReference

Height (exhaust)

266 cmReference

—

Ground clearance

42 cmReference

45 cmReference

2WD Front tread

141 to 192 cmReference

—

4WD Front tread

146 to 198 cmReference

—

Rear tread

140 to 217 cmReference

—

2WD ROPS

3600 kgReference

—

2WD Cab

3900 kgReference

—

4WD ROPS

3870 kgReference

—

4WD Cab

4100 kgReference

—

Wheelbase

—

240 cmReference

Rear tire

—

13R38Reference

Ag front

—

9.5R24Reference

Ag rear

—

13R38Reference

Width

—

182 cmReference

Height

—

264 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

—

Battery AH

170Reference

—

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.