Compare/J.I. Case 1200 Traction King vs J.I. Case 2294
Search

J.I. Case 1200 Traction King vs J.I. Case 2294

Verdict: J.I. Case 1200 Traction King vs J.I. Case 2294

The J.I. Case 1200 Traction King and the J.I. Case 2294 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. J.I. Case 2294 leads on rated power with 132 hp against 120 hp. J.I. Case 1200 Traction King is the lighter machine (7,801 kg vs 11,070 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. J.I. Case 2294 is the newer design (1984 vs 1966). In short: choose the J.I. Case 2294 for outright pulling power, or the J.I. Case 1200 Traction King if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
J.I. Case 1200 Traction King Tractor
J.I. Case
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
J.I. Case 2294 Tractor
J.I. Case
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
120 hp
132 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
J.I. CaseReference
J.I. CaseReference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
With 18.4x38 rear tires.Reference
Factories
Rockford, Illinois, USAReference
Total built
1,549Reference
Drive
4x4 4WDReference
Steering
four-wheel hydraulic powerReference
Engine
Drawbar (claimed)
79.0 kWReference
86.5 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
79.2 kWReference
86.0 kWReference
Displacement
7.4 LReference
8.3 LReference
Bore/Stroke
111 x 127 mmReference
117 x 127 mmReference
Air cleaner
oil bathReference
Compression
15:1Reference
15.8:1Reference
Rated RPM
2000Reference
2100Reference
Starter volts
24Reference
12Reference
Power at rated engine speed
89.4 kWReference
98.4 kWReference
Max power
79.2 kWReference
86.0 kWReference
Engine
114.8 kWReference
Power
114.8 kWReference
Oil capacity
94.6 LReference
Coolant capacity
36.0 LReference
Transmission
Transmission
Clark R500Reference
Gears
6 forward and reverseReference
12 forward and 3 reverseReference
Clutch
dry discReference
hydraulicReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
89.5 kWReference
96.9 kWReference
PTO (tested)
89.4 kWReference
98.4 kWReference
Pressure
103.4 barReference
155.1 barReference
Valves
2Reference
2 to 4Reference
Total flow
90.8 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIIReference
IIReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
540/1000Reference
Hydraulic system
94.6 LReference
Type
three-speed power shiftReference
Capacity
94.6 LReference
Pump flow
87.1 lpmReference
Steering flow
30.3 lpmReference
Steering press.
137.9 barReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
2993 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
255 cmReference
279 cmReference
Weight
7801 kgReference
11070 to 14390 poundsReference
Front tire
23.1-26Reference
11.00x16Reference
Rear tire
23.1-26Reference
18.4-38 (2WD)Reference
Ag front
23.1-26Reference
Ag rear
23.1-26Reference
20.8x38Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 14.9-28. Rear: 18.4-38 (4WD)Reference
Bar rear axle
88 by 3048 mmReference
Rear tread
152 to 284 cmReference
Shipping
5021 kgReference
Operating
6527 kgReference
Test results
Fuel use
31.0 l/hourReference
33.3 l/hourReference
Max pull
7194 kgReference
5904 kgReference
Capacities
Fuel
94.6 LReference
Max capacity
7529 kgReference
2294 Serial Numbers
1984
9931808Reference
1985
9938113Reference
1986
9941577Reference
1987
9945448Reference
1988
9949350Reference
Location:
Inside cab or on right-front frameReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
105Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)