Compare/J.I. Case 1410 vs J.I. Case 970
Search

J.I. Case 1410 vs J.I. Case 970

Verdict: J.I. Case 1410 vs J.I. Case 970

The J.I. Case 1410 and the J.I. Case 970 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. J.I. Case 970 leads on rated power with 86 hp against 81 hp. J.I. Case 1410 is the lighter machine (3,220 kg vs 10,050 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. J.I. Case 1410 is the newer design (1976 vs 1970). In short: choose the J.I. Case 970 for outright pulling power, or the J.I. Case 1410 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
J.I. Case 1410 Tractor
J.I. Case
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
J.I. Case 970 Tractor
J.I. Case
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
81 hp
86 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
J.I. CaseReference
J.I. CaseReference
liquid-cooledReference
Four gears each with reverse and a three-speed forward powershift.Reference
Original price
$17,700 (1980)Reference
Total built
8,542Reference
Engine
Drawbar (claimed)
49.2 kWReference
52.2 kWReference
Displacement
3.6 LReference
6.2 LReference
Bore/Stroke
100 x 114 mmReference
102 x 127 mmReference
Rated RPM
2300Reference
1900Reference
Coolant capacity
14.2 LReference
36.0 LReference
Fuel tank
189.2 LReference
Drawbar (tested)
59.6 kWReference
Compression
7.5:1Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
Air cleaner
paper elementReference
Power at rated engine speed
70.0 kWReference
Max power
59.6 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
Transmission
Hydra-ShiftReference
Range Power ShiftReference
Clutch
hydraulic wet discsReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
60.4 kWReference
64.1 kWReference
Hydraulic system
49.2 LReference
Type
partial power shiftReference
partial power shiftReference
Capacity
49.2 LReference
Valves
1Reference
Pump flow
30.3 lpmReference
60.6 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
IIReference
Rear PTO
independenReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540, 1000Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
PTO (tested)
70.0 kWReference
Total flow
90.8 lpmReference
Steering flow
30.3 lpmReference
Engine RPM
1000@1900Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
68.7 kWReference
Capacities
Fuel
83.3 LReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
228 cmReference
Weight
3220 kgReference
10050 to 11190 poundsReference
Front tire
7.50-16Reference
10.00-16Reference
Rear tire
18.4-34Reference
18.4-38Reference
Ag front
7.50-16Reference
10.00-16Reference
Ag rear
18.4-34Reference
18.4-38Reference
Wide-front Wheelbase
274 cmReference
Tricycle Wheelbase
256 cmReference
Length
411 cmReference
Height (hood)
198 cmReference
Ground clearance
38 cmReference
Operating
5075 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Batteries
2 (diesel)Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
970 Serial Numbers
1970
8650001Reference
1971
8674001Reference
1972
8691801Reference
1973
8712001Reference
1974
8736601Reference
1975
8770001Reference
1976
8797501Reference
1977
8809950Reference
1978
8830001Reference
Location:
Plate on instrument panelReference
Test results
Fuel use
22.3 l/hourReference
Max pull
4828 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)