Compare/J.I. Case 1470 Traction King vs J.I. Case 2394
Search

J.I. Case 1470 Traction King vs J.I. Case 2394

Verdict: J.I. Case 1470 Traction King vs J.I. Case 2394

The J.I. Case 1470 Traction King and the J.I. Case 2394 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. J.I. Case 2394 leads on rated power with 162 hp against 145 hp. J.I. Case 1470 Traction King is the lighter machine (7,847 kg vs 14,270 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. J.I. Case 2394 is the newer design (1984 vs 1969). In short: choose the J.I. Case 2394 for outright pulling power, or the J.I. Case 1470 Traction King if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
J.I. Case 1470 Traction King Tractor
J.I. Case
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
J.I. Case 2394 Tractor
J.I. Case
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
145 hp
162 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
J.I. CaseReference
J.I. CaseReference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Six power shift gears (1-6), plus reverse, in four ranges (1-4). Reverse does not work in fourth range.Reference
Drive
4x4 4WDReference
Steering
four-wheel hydraulic power steeringReference
Engine
Fuel tank
264.9 LReference
Drawbar (claimed)
94.0 kWReference
105.9 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
94.6 kWReference
102.7 kWReference
Displacement
8.3 LReference
8.3 LReference
Bore/Stroke
117 x 127 mmReference
117 x 127 mmReference
Air cleaner
dryReference
Compression
16.5:1Reference
Rated RPM
2000Reference
2100Reference
Starter volts
24Reference
12Reference
Power at rated engine speed
108.0 kWReference
120.9 kWReference
Max power
94.6 kWReference
102.7 kWReference
Engine
146.9 kWReference
Power
146.9 kWReference
Oil capacity
121.1 LReference
Coolant capacity
41.6 LReference
Transmission
Gears
8 forward and 4 reverseReference
24 forward and 3 reverseReference
Clutch
dry discReference
hydraulic wet discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
108.1 kWReference
119.3 kWReference
PTO (tested)
108.0 kWReference
120.9 kWReference
Type
open centerReference
four-speed power shiftReference
Pump flow
58.7 lpmReference
102.2 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIIReference
IIIReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
1000Reference
Engine RPM
1000@2000Reference
Hydraulic system
121.1 LReference
Capacity
121.1 LReference
Pressure
155.1 barReference
Valves
2 to 4Reference
Steering flow
30.3 lpmReference
Steering press.
137.9 barReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
3515 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
259 cmReference
299 cmReference
Weight
7847 kgReference
14270 to 16240 poundsReference
Front tire
28.1-26Reference
11.00x16Reference
Rear tire
28.1-26Reference
18.4x38Reference
Ag front
18.4x30Reference
14Lx16Reference
Ag rear
18.4x30Reference
20.8x42Reference
Operating weight
7847 kgReference
Width
304 cmReference
Bar rear axle
98 by 3048 mmReference
Rear tread
152 to 335 cmReference
Shipping
6472 kgReference
Operating
7366 kgReference
Test results
Fuel use
30.3 l/hourReference
39.0 l/hourReference
Max pull
8047 kgReference
7029 kgReference
Capacities
Fuel
94.6 LReference
Max capacity
9298 kgReference
2394 Serial Numbers
1984
9931802Reference
1985
9939020Reference
1986
9941573Reference
1987
9945454Reference
1988
9948517Reference
Location:
Inside cab or on right-front frameReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
105Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)