Compare/J.I. Case 500 vs J.I. Case 770
Search

J.I. Case 500 vs J.I. Case 770

Verdict: J.I. Case 500 vs J.I. Case 770

The J.I. Case 500 and the J.I. Case 770 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. J.I. Case 500 leads on rated power with 55 hp against 54 hp. J.I. Case 500 is the lighter machine (3,628 kg vs 4,182 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. J.I. Case 770 holds more fuel (189.2 L vs 113.6 L) for longer stints between fills. J.I. Case 770 is the newer design (1969 vs 1953). In short: choose the J.I. Case 500 for outright pulling power, or the J.I. Case 770 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
J.I. Case 500 Tractor
J.I. Case
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
J.I. Case 770 Tractor
J.I. Case
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
55 hp
54 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
J.I. CaseReference
J.I. CaseReference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Four gears each with reverse and a three-speed forward powershift.Reference
Total built
5,985Reference
1,690Reference
Variants
520
industrial tractorReference
Engine
Fuel tank
113.6 LReference
189.2 LReference
Drawbar (claimed)
32.8 kWReference
36.5 kWReference
Belt (claimed)
41.0 kWReference
Plows
5Reference
Drawbar (tested)
42.0 kWReference
42.4 kWReference
Belt (tested)
47.6 kWReference
Displacement
6.2 LReference
4.1 LReference
Bore/Stroke
102 x 127 mmReference
102 x 127 mmReference
Air cleaner
oil bathReference
paper element with precleanerReference
Compression
15.0:1Reference
7.5:1Reference
Rated RPM
1350Reference
1900Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Belt power (max)
47.6 kWReference
Max power
42.0 kWReference
41.7 kWReference
Coolant capacity
26.5 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
48.1 kWReference
Transmission
Type
gearReference
partial power shiftReference
Gears
4 forward and 1 reverseReference
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
Clutch
hydraulic wet discsReference
Transmission
Range Power ShiftReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
41.0 kWReference
41.8 kWReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
PTO (tested)
48.1 kWReference
Pump flow
60.6 lpmReference
Total flow
90.8 lpmReference
Steering flow
30.3 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
Engine RPM
1000@1900Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
46.2 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
223 cmReference
Weight
3628 kgReference
4182 kgReference
Front tire
7.50-18Reference
7.5L-15Reference
Rear tire
15-30Reference
16.9-34Reference
Ag front
30 (steel)Reference
7.5L-15Reference
Ag rear
48 (steel)Reference
16.9-34Reference
Length
290 cmReference
388 cmReference
Height
155 cmReference
Operating weight
3628 kgReference
4182 kgReference
Ballasted weight
5264 kgReference
4966 kgReference
Front tread
157 cmReference
152 to 223 cmReference
Rear tread
154 cmReference
152 to 223 cmReference
Wide-front Wheelbase
256 cmReference
Tricycle Wheelbase
238 cmReference
Height (hood)
170 cmReference
Ground clearance
38 cmReference
500 Serial Numbers
1857
8100001Reference
1953
5700001Reference
1954
8035001Reference
1955
8060001Reference
1956
8080001Reference
Location:
plate on instrument panelReference
Capacities
Diameter
33 cmReference
Width
20 cmReference
RPM
956Reference
Speed
991.82 meters/minReference
Test results
Max pull
3360 kgReference
4049 kgReference
Fuel use
15.9 l/hourReference
770 Serial Numbers
1969
8356251Reference
1970
8650001Reference
1971
8674001Reference
1972
8691801Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)