Compare/Kubota M105S vs Kubota M95GX-IV

Kubota M105S vs Kubota M95GX-IV

Verdict: Kubota M105S vs Kubota M95GX-IV

The Kubota M105S and the Kubota M95GX-IV are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Kubota M105S leads on rated power with 105 hp against 104 hp. Kubota M105S is the lighter machine (6,305 kg vs 9,480 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Kubota M95GX-IV holds more fuel (190.0 L vs 174.9 L) for longer stints between fills. Kubota M95GX-IV is the newer design (2018 vs 2005). In short: choose the Kubota M105S for outright pulling power, or the Kubota M95GX-IV if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Kubota

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Kubota

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

105 hp

104 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

KubotaReference

liquid-cooledReference

Eight power shift gears in three synchronized ranges with shuttle.Reference

Differential lock

—

electro-hydraulic front and rearReference

Variants

M105X

IntelliShiftReference

—

M105H

2WD ROPSReference

—

M105HD

4WD ROPSReference

—

M105DSF

2WD ROPSReference

—

M105DS

4WD ROPSReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

174.9 LReference

190.0 LReference

Engine (net)

78.3 kWReference

—

Displacement

3.8 LReference

Bore/Stroke

100 x 120 mmReference

Power (net)

78.3 kWReference

—

Air cleaner

dry, dual elementReference

—

Rated RPM

2600Reference

2400Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

—

15.9 LReference

Engine (gross)

—

77.6 kWReference

Emissions

—

Stage IVReference

Rated Power (gross)

—

77.6 kWReference

Torque

—

345.8 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1500Reference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

Swing ShiftReference

—

Gears

16 forward and reverseReference

32 forward and reverseReference

Clutch

—

electro-hydraulic wet discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

69.4 kWReference

—

Type

open centerReference

creeperReference

Pressure

196.1 barReference

—

Valves

1 to 3Reference

2 to 4Reference

Pump flow

65.1 lpmReference

76.5 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

IIIReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

3397 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

540/540EReference

Engine RPM

540@2205Reference

—

Control

—

position and lower-link draft controlReference

Rear lift (at ends)

—

5000 kgReference

Front PTO

—

independentReference

Front PTO Type

—

1000Reference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

243 cmReference

254 cmReference

Weight

6305 to 8642 poundsReference

4560 kgReference

Front tire

10.00-16Reference

380/70R24Reference

2WD Rear tire

18.4-34Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 18.4-34Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 13.6-24. Rear: 18.4-34Reference

—

Length

411 cmReference

431 cmReference

Width

200 cmReference

227 cmReference

Height (cab)

269 cmReference

—

Ground clearance

43 cmReference

—

2WD Front tread

153 to 203 cmReference

—

4WD Front tread

152 to 166 cmReference

—

Rear tread

152 to 203 cmReference

175/180/190 cmReference

2WD ROPS

2859 kgReference

—

2WD cab

3200 kgReference

—

4WD cab

3920 kgReference

—

Rear tire

—

520/70R34Reference

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 380/70R24. Rear: 520/70R34Reference

Height

—

282 cmReference

Front tread

—

163 to 167 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

80Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.