Compare/Landini Advantage 60F vs Landini Powerfarm 65

Landini Advantage 60F vs Landini Powerfarm 65

Verdict: Landini Advantage 60F vs Landini Powerfarm 65

The Landini Advantage 60F and the Landini Powerfarm 65 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Landini Powerfarm 65 leads on rated power with 61 hp against 60 hp. Landini Powerfarm 65 holds more fuel (102.2 L vs 53.0 L) for longer stints between fills. Landini Powerfarm 65 is the newer design (2007 vs 1995). In short: choose the Landini Powerfarm 65 for outright pulling power, or the Landini Advantage 60F if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Landini

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Landini

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

60 hp

61 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Landini (a part of Argo)Reference

With 13.6-24 rear tires.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Differential lock

—

electro-hydraulic front and rearReference

Variants

60GE

low-profileReference

—

60F

orchardReference

—

60L

wide orchardReference

—

60V

vineyardReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

53.0 LReference

102.2 LReference

Engine

44.7 kWReference

45.5 kWReference

Displacement

2.5 LReference

3.3 LReference

Bore/Stroke

91 x 127 mmReference

105 x 127 mmReference

Power

44.7 kWReference

45.5 kWReference

Air cleaner

dryReference

—

Compression

15.5:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2250Reference

2200Reference

Torque

214.0 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1500Reference

—

Starter

electricReference

Starter volts

12Reference

Emissions

—

Stage IIIReference

Transmission

Type

creeperReference

mechanical shuttle with overdriveReference

Gears

24 forward and 12 reverseReference

Clutch

279.4mm mechanial dry discReference

mechanical dry discReference

Transmission

—

Speed FourReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Valves

2Reference

Pump flow

38.6 lpmReference

51.9 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

Control

position and draft controlReference

—

Rear lift

2600 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/750 (1.375)Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

Engine RPM

750@1917Reference

—

Total flow

—

81.8 lpmReference

Steering flow

—

29.9 lpmReference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

196 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

189 cmReference

—

Weight

4872 to 5247 poundsReference

—

Front tire

7.50-15Reference

—

2WD Rear tire

13.6-24Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 7.50-15. Rear: 13.6-24Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 8.25-16. Rear: 13.6-24Reference

—

2WD Optional tires (ag)

Front: 6.00-16. Rear: 360/70R24Reference

—

4WD Optional tires (ag)

Front: 750-16. Rear: 360/70R24Reference

—

Length

332 cmReference

—

Width

133 cmReference

—

Height (steering wheel)

145 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

225 cmReference

—

2WD ROPS Weight

2209 kgReference

—

4WD ROPS Weight

2380 kgReference

—

Ground clearance

38 cmReference

—

2WD Front tread

108 to 148 cmReference

—

4WD Front tread

108 to 138 cmReference

—

Rear tread

98 to 152 cmReference

—

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

Lucas A115Reference

alternatorReference

Charging amps

45Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.