Search
Leyland 255 vs Leyland 470
Verdict: Leyland 255 vs Leyland 470
The Leyland 255 and the Leyland 470 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Leyland 470 leads on rated power with 70 hp against 60 hp. Leyland 470 is the lighter machine (3,181 kg vs 5,379 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Leyland 470 is the newer design (1973 vs 1972). In short: choose the Leyland 470 for outright pulling power, or the Leyland 255 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Leyland
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Leyland
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
60 hp
70 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
LeylandReference
LeylandReference
Five gears (1-5) plus reverse (R) in two ranges (low/high).Reference
Five gears (1-5) plus reverse (R) in two ranges (low/high).Reference
Steering
power assistReference
power assistReference
Engine
Engine (gross)
44.7 kWReference
—
Engine (net)
41.8 kWReference
52.2 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
30.2 kWReference
—
Displacement
3.6 LReference
3.8 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 125 mmReference
98 x 125 mmReference
Power (net)
41.8 kWReference
52.2 kWReference
Power (gross)
44.7 kWReference
—
Air cleaner
dryReference
dryReference
Compression
17.8:1Reference
—
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
9.0 LReference
—
Power at rated engine speed
35.7 kWReference
—
Max power
30.2 kWReference
—
Fuel tank
—
68.1 LReference
Fuel system
—
direct injectionReference
Torque
—
257.6 NmReference
Torque RPM
—
1300Reference
Transmission
Gears
10 forward and 2 reverseReference
10 forward and 2 reverseReference
Clutch
mechanical dry discReference
mechanical dry discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
37.3 kWReference
—
PTO (tested)
35.7 kWReference
—
Hydraulic system
56.0 LReference
—
Type
gearReference
gearReference
Capacity
56.0 LReference
—
Pressure
180.0 barReference
—
Pump flow
29.9 lpmReference
29.9 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/IReference
II/IReference
Rear lift
1819 kgReference
1814 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540Reference
540Reference
Engine RPM
540@1813Reference
—
Power at rated PTO speed
32.7 kWReference
—
Control
—
position and top-link draft controlReference
Capacities
Fuel
68.1 LReference
—
Dimensions
Wheelbase
202 cmReference
209 cmReference
Weight
5379 to 6300 poundsReference
3181 kgReference
Front tire
7.50-16Reference
10x24Reference
Rear tire
16.9-28Reference
12x38Reference
Ag front
7.50-16Reference
10x24Reference
Ag rear
16.9-28Reference
12x38Reference
Length
334 cmReference
372 cmReference
Width
162 cmReference
—
Height (steering wheel)
159 cmReference
—
Height (cab)
235 cmReference
243 cmReference
Ground clearance
42 cmReference
—
Shipping
2700 kgReference
—
Operating
2857 kgReference
—
Ballasted
3905 kgReference
—
Front tread
—
152 to 182 cmReference
Rear tread
—
142 to 203 cmReference
Test results
Fuel use
10.2 l/hourReference
—
Electrical
Charging system
—
alternatorReference
Charging amps
—
34Reference
Battery volts
—
12Reference
Battery AH
—
128Reference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.


