Search
Leyland 282 vs Leyland 384
Verdict: Leyland 282 vs Leyland 384
The Leyland 282 and the Leyland 384 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Leyland 384 leads on rated power with 75 hp against 74 hp. Leyland 384 is the lighter machine (2,540 kg vs 3,180 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Leyland 282 is the newer design (1979 vs 1969). In short: choose the Leyland 384 for outright pulling power, or the Leyland 282 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Leyland
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Leyland
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
74 hp
75 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
LeylandReference
LeylandReference
Gear 5 used for power test.Reference
With 13.6/12-36 rear tires.Reference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
—
Final drives
—
spur gearReference
Variants
482
4WDReference
—
Engine
Engine
61.1 kWReference
—
Drawbar (tested)
43.4 kWReference
—
Displacement
3.8 LReference
3.8 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 125 mmReference
100 x 120 mmReference
Power
61.1 kWReference
—
Air cleaner
single paper elementReference
dryReference
Compression
16.8:1Reference
17.3:1Reference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Torque
94.9 NmReference
238.7 NmReference
Torque RPM
1200Reference
1400Reference
Power at rated engine speed
55.4 kWReference
—
Max power
43.4 kWReference
—
Engine (gross)
—
55.9 kWReference
Power (gross)
—
55.9 kWReference
Fuel system
—
direct injectionReference
Firing order
—
1-3-4-2Reference
Starter
—
electricReference
Starter volts
—
12Reference
Oil capacity
—
56.8 LReference
Coolant capacity
—
13.6 LReference
Transmission
Gears
9 forward and 3 reverseReference
10 forward and 2 reverseReference
Clutch
—
279mm dry discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (tested)
55.4 kWReference
—
Total flow
31.0 lpmReference
—
Rear lift
2700 kgReference
2233 kgReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000Reference
540 (1.375)Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
52.8 kWReference
—
PTO (claimed)
—
46.2 kWReference
Hydraulic system
—
56.4 LReference
Type
—
open centerReference
Capacity
—
56.4 LReference
Pump flow
—
29.5 lpmReference
Rear Type
—
II/IReference
Control
—
position and draft controlReference
Rear PTO
—
independentReference
Engine RPM
—
540@1813Reference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
203 cmReference
203 cmReference
Weight
3180 kgReference
2540 kgReference
Front tire
10.00-16Reference
7.50-16Reference
Rear tire
16.9-34Reference
13.6/12-36Reference
Ag front
10.00-16Reference
7.50-16Reference
Ag rear
16.9-34Reference
13.6-12-38Reference
Length
383 cmReference
340 cmReference
Height
261 cmReference
—
Width
—
174 cmReference
Height (steering wheel)
—
167 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
—
223 cmReference
Clearance (front axle)
—
46 cmReference
Clearance (rear axle)
—
61 cmReference
Front tread
—
132 to 193 cmReference
Rear tread
—
132 to 203 cmReference
Test results
Fuel use
17.4 l/hourReference
—
Capacities
Fuel
—
68.1 LReference
Electrical
Charging system
—
generatorReference
Charging amps
—
18Reference
Battery volts
—
12Reference
Battery AH
—
120Reference
Speeds
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.


