Compare/Leyland 384 vs Leyland 482

Leyland 384 vs Leyland 482

Verdict: Leyland 384 vs Leyland 482

The Leyland 384 and the Leyland 482 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Leyland 384 leads on rated power with 75 hp against 74 hp. Leyland 384 is the lighter machine (2,540 kg vs 3,361 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Leyland 482 is the newer design (1979 vs 1969). In short: choose the Leyland 384 for outright pulling power, or the Leyland 482 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Leyland

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Leyland

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

75 hp

74 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

LeylandReference

Final drives

spur gearReference

—

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

With 13.6/12-36 rear tires.Reference

Gear 5 used for power test.Reference

Engine (gross)

55.9 kWReference

—

Displacement

3.8 LReference

Bore/Stroke

100 x 120 mmReference

98 x 125 mmReference

Power (gross)

55.9 kWReference

—

Fuel system

direct injectionReference

—

Air cleaner

dryReference

single paper elementReference

Compression

17.3:1Reference

16.8:1Reference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Torque

238.7 NmReference

94.9 NmReference

Torque RPM

1400Reference

1200Reference

Firing order

1-3-4-2Reference

—

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

56.8 LReference

—

Coolant capacity

13.6 LReference

—

Engine

—

61.1 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

—

41.8 kWReference

Power

—

61.1 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

55.4 kWReference

Max power

—

41.8 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

10 forward and 2 reverseReference

9 forward and 3 reverseReference

Clutch

279mm dry discReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

46.2 kWReference

—

Hydraulic system

56.4 LReference

—

Type

open centerReference

—

Capacity

56.4 LReference

—

Pump flow

29.5 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

II/IReference

—

Control

position and draft controlReference

—

Rear lift

2233 kgReference

2700 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

—

Rear PTO Type

540 (1.375)Reference

540/1000Reference

Engine RPM

540@1813Reference

—

PTO (tested)

—

55.4 kWReference

Total flow

—

31.0 lpmReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

52.8 kWReference

Capacities

Fuel

68.1 LReference

—

Dimensions

Wheelbase

203 cmReference

211 cmReference

Weight

2540 kgReference

3361 kgReference

Front tire

7.50-16Reference

12.4-28Reference

Rear tire

13.6/12-36Reference

16.9-34Reference

Ag front

7.50-16Reference

12.4-28Reference

Ag rear

13.6-12-38Reference

16.9-34Reference

Length

340 cmReference

383 cmReference

Width

174 cmReference

—

Height (steering wheel)

167 cmReference

—

Height (exhaust)

223 cmReference

—

Clearance (front axle)

46 cmReference

—

Clearance (rear axle)

61 cmReference

—

Front tread

132 to 193 cmReference

—

Rear tread

132 to 203 cmReference

—

Height

—

261 cmReference

Operating weight

—

3361 kgReference

Ballasted weight

—

5443 kgReference

Electrical

Charging system

generatorReference

—

Charging amps

18Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

—

Battery AH

120Reference

—

Speeds

Variants

282

—

2WDReference

Test results

Fuel use

—

17.0 l/hourReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.