Compare/Massey Ferguson 1114 vs Massey Ferguson 4365
Search

Massey Ferguson 1114 vs Massey Ferguson 4365

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 1114 vs Massey Ferguson 4365

The Massey Ferguson 1114 and the Massey Ferguson 4365 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 4365 leads on rated power with 112 hp against 110 hp. Massey Ferguson 4365 is the lighter machine (7,780 kg vs 10,694 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 4365 is the newer design (2002 vs 1978). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 4365 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 1114 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Massey Ferguson 1114 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
94
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Massey Ferguson 4365 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
94
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
110 hp
112 hp
Confidence
98%
98%
Guide price
Overview
Distributor
Massey FergusonReference
Manufacturer
LandiniReference
Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference
liquid-cooledReference
liquid-cooledReference
Differential lock
electro-hydraulic front and rearReference
Engine
Fuel tank
199.8 LReference
Engine
82.0 kWReference
Displacement
5.8 LReference
4.0 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 127 mmReference
100 x 127 mmReference
Power
82.0 kWReference
Rated RPM
2400Reference
2200Reference
Torque
374.1 NmReference
440.7 NmReference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
1400Reference
Engine (gross)
83.5 kWReference
Engine (net)
76.8 kWReference
Rated Power (net)
76.8 kWReference
Power (gross)
83.5 kWReference
Air cleaner
dryReference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
Coolant capacity
17.5 LReference
Transmission
Type
partially synchronizedReference
power shuttleReference
Gears
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
24 forward and reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Total flow
62.1 lpmReference
65.9 lpmReference
Rear Type
III/IIReference
IIReference
Rear lift
4800 kgReference
5000 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
PTO (claimed)
70.5 kWReference
Hydraulic system
50.0 LReference
Capacity
50.0 LReference
SCV flow
37.9 lpmReference
Control
electronic draft controlReference
Front lift
2500 kgReference
Clutch
wet discReference
Engine RPM
1000@2000Reference
Front PTO
independentReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
279 cmReference
234 cmReference
Weight
5341 kgReference
7780 to 8267 poundsReference
Front tire
11.00-16Reference
10.00-16Reference
Rear tire
18.4-38Reference
Ag front
13.6-28Reference
Ag rear
18.4-38Reference
Length
469 cmReference
414 cmReference
Width
241 cmReference
205 cmReference
Height (cab)
290 cmReference
261 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
315 cmReference
Ground clearance
44 cmReference
39 cmReference
Front tread
180 cmReference
Rear tread
184 to 230 cmReference
2WD Rear tire
16.9R38Reference
2WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 16.9R38Reference
4WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 13.6R28. Rear: 16.9R38Reference
2WD Weight
3529 kgReference
4WD Weight
3749 kgReference
Capacities
Fuel
127.2 LReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)