Compare/Massey Ferguson 1114 vs Massey Ferguson 6713S

Massey Ferguson 1114 vs Massey Ferguson 6713S

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 1114 vs Massey Ferguson 6713S

The Massey Ferguson 1114 and the Massey Ferguson 6713S are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 110 hp. Massey Ferguson 6713S is the lighter machine (6,999 kg vs 10,694 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 6713S holds more fuel (253.6 L vs 199.8 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 6713S is the newer design (2017 vs 1978). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

110 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Distributor

Massey FergusonReference

—

Manufacturer

LandiniReference

Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference

liquid-cooledReference

liquid-cooled inlineReference

Differential lock

—

electro-hydraulic front and rearReference

Trailer brakes

—

hydraulicReference

Engine

Fuel tank

199.8 LReference

253.6 LReference

Engine

82.0 kWReference

85.8 kWReference

Displacement

5.8 LReference

4.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

98 x 127 mmReference

108 x 134 mmReference

Power

82.0 kWReference

85.8 kWReference

Rated RPM

2400Reference

2100Reference

Torque

374.1 NmReference

648.2 NmReference

Torque RPM

1400Reference

1500Reference

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

—

29.9 LReference

Emissions

—

Stage VReference

Emission control

—

SCR/DEF/DOCReference

Maximum Power

—

96.9 kWReference

Fuel system

—

high-pressure common rail direct injectionReference

Starter

—

electricReference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Transmission

Type

partially synchronizedReference

continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference

Gears

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

infinite forward and reverseReference

Transmission

—

Dyna-VTReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Total flow

62.1 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

III/IIReference

IIIReference

Rear lift

4800 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

82.0 kWReference

Pressure

—

200.0 barReference

Rear valves

—

5Reference

Front valves

—

2Reference

Pump flow

—

189.2 lpmReference

Clutch

—

wet discReference

Engine RPM

—

1000@1920Reference

Front PTO

—

independentReference

Front PTO Type

—

1000Reference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

279 cmReference

266 cmReference

Weight

5341 kgReference

6999 kgReference

Front tire

11.00-16Reference

—

Rear tire

18.4-38Reference

—

Ag front

13.6-28Reference

—

Ag rear

18.4-38Reference

—

Length

469 cmReference

492 cmReference

Width

241 cmReference

182 cmReference

Height (cab)

290 cmReference

302 cmReference

Height (exhaust)

315 cmReference

—

Ground clearance

44 cmReference

—

Front tread

180 cmReference

—

Rear tread

184 to 230 cmReference

—

Max weight

—

12500 kgReference

Variants

MT465E

—

similar Challenger modelReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.