Compare/Massey Ferguson 1134 vs Massey Ferguson 6715S

Massey Ferguson 1134 vs Massey Ferguson 6715S

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 1134 vs Massey Ferguson 6715S

The Massey Ferguson 1134 and the Massey Ferguson 6715S are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 132 hp. Massey Ferguson 6715S is the lighter machine (6,999 kg vs 11,135 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 6715S holds more fuel (253.6 L vs 199.8 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 6715S is the newer design (2017 vs 1978). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

132 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Distributor

Massey FergusonReference

—

Manufacturer

LandiniReference

Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference

Image courtesy of Beukeveld Exports BVReference

Pull at 3.56KPHReference

Differential lock

—

electro-hydraulic front and rearReference

Trailer brakes

—

hydraulicReference

Engine

Fuel tank

199.8 LReference

253.6 LReference

Engine

98.4 kWReference

104.4 kWReference

Displacement

5.8 LReference

4.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

98 x 127 mmReference

108 x 134 mmReference

Power

98.4 kWReference

104.4 kWReference

Rated RPM

2400Reference

2100Reference

Torque

461.0 NmReference

744.4 NmReference

Torque RPM

1600Reference

1500Reference

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

—

29.9 LReference

Drawbar (tested)

—

92.9 kWReference

Emissions

—

Stage VReference

Emission control

—

SCR/DEF/DOCReference

Maximum Power

—

111.9 kWReference

Fuel system

—

high-pressure common rail direct injectionReference

Starter

—

electricReference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Max power

—

90.4 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

97.5 kWReference

Transmission

Type

partially synchronizedReference

continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference

Gears

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

infinite forward and reverseReference

Transmission

—

Dyna-VTReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Total flow

62.1 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

III/IIReference

IIIReference

Rear lift

4800 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

96.9 kWReference

PTO (tested)

—

107.4 kWReference

Pressure

—

200.0 barReference

Rear valves

—

5Reference

Front valves

—

2Reference

Pump flow

—

189.2 lpmReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

5100 kgReference

Clutch

—

wet discReference

Engine RPM

—

1000@1920Reference

Front PTO

—

independentReference

Front PTO Type

—

1000Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

106.2 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

279 cmReference

266 cmReference

Weight

5650 kgReference

6999 kgReference

Front tire

11.00-16Reference

—

Rear tire

18.4-38Reference

—

Ag front

13.6-28Reference

—

Ag rear

18.4-38Reference

—

Length

469 cmReference

492 cmReference

Width

241 cmReference

182 cmReference

Height (cab)

290 cmReference

302 cmReference

Height (exhaust)

315 cmReference

—

Ground clearance

44 cmReference

—

Front tread

180 cmReference

—

Rear tread

184 to 230 cmReference

—

Variants

MT485E

—

similar Challenger modelReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Charging amps

—

240Reference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

—

33.7 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

6831 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.