Compare/Massey Ferguson 2220 vs Massey Ferguson 273

Massey Ferguson 2220 vs Massey Ferguson 273

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 2220 vs Massey Ferguson 273

The Massey Ferguson 2220 and the Massey Ferguson 273 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 273 leads on rated power with 59 hp against 58 hp. Massey Ferguson 2220 is the lighter machine (2,245 kg vs 5,390 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 2220 is the newer design (1999 vs 1983). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 273 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 2220 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

58 hp

59 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

PTO performanceReference

Four synchronized gears in three ranges, plus reverse range.Reference

Original price

$35,000Reference

—

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Engine

47.0 kWReference

44.0 kWReference

Displacement

2.7 LReference

3.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

95 x 127 mmReference

98 x 127 mmReference

Power

47.0 kWReference

44.0 kWReference

Air cleaner

dual paper elementsReference

—

Compression

17.3:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2250Reference

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Coolant capacity

10.0 LReference

—

Max power

43.6 kWReference

—

Power at rated engine speed

43.5 kWReference

—

Fuel tank

—

60.9 LReference

Torque

—

238.7 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1400Reference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

Gears

12 forward and reverseReference

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

43.3 kWReference

—

PTO (tested)

43.6 kWReference

—

Hydraulic system

35.2 LReference

—

Capacity

35.2 LReference

—

Valves

2Reference

—

Pump flow

29.9 lpmReference

36.0 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

Rear lift (at ends)

3396 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540Reference

540 (1.375)Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

42.8 kWReference

—

Type

—

synchromeshReference

Pressure

—

170.1 barReference

Rear lift

—

2650 kgReference

Engine RPM

—

1000@1916Reference

Capacities

Fuel

53.0 LReference

—

Max capacity

—

4199 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

200 cmReference

—

Weight

2245 kgReference

5390 to 5954 poundsReference

Front tire

11.2R20Reference

7.50-18Reference

Rear tire

14.9R28Reference

—

Ag front

11.2R20Reference

—

Ag rear

14.9R28Reference

—

Operating weight

2245 kgReference

—

2WD Wheelbase

—

220 cmReference

4WD Wheelbase

—

217 cmReference

2WD Rear tire

—

16.9-30Reference

2WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 7.50-18. Rear: 16.9-30Reference

4WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 16.9-30Reference

2WD Length

—

366 cmReference

4WD Length

—

383 cmReference

Width

—

193 cmReference

Height

—

221 cmReference

2WD Ground clearance

—

46 cmReference

4WD Ground clearance

—

40 cmReference

2WD

—

2444 kgReference

4WD

—

2700 kgReference

Test results

Fuel use

12.9 l/hourReference

—

Variants

6830

—

similar Landini modelReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.