Compare/Massey Ferguson 254S vs Massey Ferguson 274

Massey Ferguson 254S vs Massey Ferguson 274

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 254S vs Massey Ferguson 274

The Massey Ferguson 254S and the Massey Ferguson 274 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 254S leads on rated power with 56 hp against 55 hp. Massey Ferguson 274 is the lighter machine (2,714 kg vs 4,674 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 254S holds more fuel (62.1 L vs 60.6 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 254S is the newer design (1983 vs 1982). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 254S for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 274 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

56 hp

55 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Distributor

Massey FergusonReference

Manufacturer

LandiniReference

Drive

4x4 MFWD 4WD optionalReference

—

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Engine

liquid-cooledReference

Four gears in three ranges, plus reverse range.Reference

Fuel tank

62.1 LReference

60.6 LReference

Engine

41.8 kWReference

—

Displacement

2.5 LReference

3.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

91 x 127 mmReference

98 x 127 mmReference

Power

41.8 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Torque

178.0 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1200Reference

—

Drawbar (tested)

—

34.4 kWReference

Fuel system

—

direct injectionReference

Air cleaner

—

oil bathReference

Compression

—

16:1Reference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Power at rated engine speed

—

41.3 kWReference

Max power

—

34.4 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

Clutch

—

11-inch dual dry discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Total flow

36.0 lpmReference

—

Rear lift

2400 kgReference

—

Rear PTO Type

540/1000/groundReference

540 (1.375)Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

41.0 kWReference

PTO (tested)

—

41.3 kWReference

Type

—

synchromeshReference

Valves

—

2Reference

Pump flow

—

35.6 lpmReference

Rear Type

—

IIReference

Control

—

draft and position controlReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

1664 kgReference

Rear PTO

—

independentReference

Engine RPM

—

540@1944Reference

Front PTO

—

direct-driveReference

Front PTO Type

—

2250Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

40.5 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

205 cmReference

222 cmReference

Weight

2370 kgReference

2714 kgReference

Front tire

7.50-16Reference

11.2-24Reference

Rear tire

12.4-32Reference

16.9-30Reference

Ag front

11.2-20Reference

—

Ag rear

12.4-32Reference

—

Length

366 cmReference

—

Height

240 cmReference

—

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 16.9-30Reference

Operating weight

—

2714 kgReference

Ballasted weight

—

3714 kgReference

Clearance (front axle)

—

35 cmReference

Front tread

—

151 cmReference

Rear tread

—

149 to 200 cmReference

Variants

273

—

similar Massey Ferguson modelReference

6830

—

similar Landini modelReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

—

11.7 l/hourReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.