Compare/Massey Ferguson 254S vs Massey Ferguson 670

Massey Ferguson 254S vs Massey Ferguson 670

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 254S vs Massey Ferguson 670

The Massey Ferguson 254S and the Massey Ferguson 670 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 56 hp. Massey Ferguson 670 is the lighter machine (3,955 kg vs 4,674 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 670 holds more fuel (71.9 L vs 62.1 L) for longer stints between fills. Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

56 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Distributor

Massey FergusonReference

—

Manufacturer

LandiniReference

Massey FergusonReference

Drive

4x4 MFWD 4WD optionalReference

—

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Final drives

—

outboard planetaryReference

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Engine

liquid-cooledReference

With 15.8-38 rear tires.Reference

Fuel tank

62.1 LReference

71.9 LReference

Engine

41.8 kWReference

—

Displacement

2.5 LReference

3.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

91 x 127 mmReference

98 x 127 mmReference

Power

41.8 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

2000Reference

Torque

178.0 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1200Reference

—

Drawbar (claimed)

—

34.3 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

—

34.5 kWReference

Fuel system

—

direct injectionReference

Air cleaner

—

dual dry elementReference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Power at rated engine speed

—

41.5 kWReference

Max power

—

34.5 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Total flow

36.0 lpmReference

64.3 lpmReference

Rear lift

2400 kgReference

—

Rear PTO Type

540/1000/groundReference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

41.8 kWReference

PTO (tested)

—

41.5 kWReference

Type

—

open centerReference

Valves

—

2 or 3Reference

Pump flow

—

26.5 lpmReference

Rear Type

—

IIReference

Control

—

position and draft controlReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

2013 kgReference

Rear PTO

—

independentReference

Clutch

—

304mm dry discReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

38.4 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

205 cmReference

228 cmReference

Weight

2370 kgReference

3955 kgReference

Front tire

7.50-16Reference

Rear tire

12.4-32Reference

—

Ag front

11.2-20Reference

—

Ag rear

12.4-32Reference

—

Length

366 cmReference

391 cmReference

Height

240 cmReference

—

2WD Rear tire

—

15.5-38Reference

2WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 7.50-16. Rear: 15.5-38Reference

4WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 16.9-30Reference

Width

—

205 cmReference

Operating weight

—

3955 kgReference

Ballasted weight

—

4173 kgReference

2WD Front tread

—

137 to 177 cmReference

4WD Front tread

—

147 to 177 cmReference

2WD Rear tread

—

152 to 228 cmReference

4WD Rear tread

—

165 to 172 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

—

13.2 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

3613 kgReference

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.