Compare/Massey Ferguson 2645 vs Massey Ferguson 4365

Massey Ferguson 2645 vs Massey Ferguson 4365

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 2645 vs Massey Ferguson 4365

The Massey Ferguson 2645 and the Massey Ferguson 4365 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 4365 leads on rated power with 112 hp against 110 hp. Massey Ferguson 2645 is the lighter machine (5,248 kg vs 7,780 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 4365 is the newer design (2002 vs 1985). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 4365 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 2645 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

110 hp

112 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Differential lock

—

electro-hydraulic front and rearReference

Engine

Fuel tank

213.1 LReference

—

Engine

82.0 kWReference

—

Displacement

5.8 LReference

4.0 LReference

Bore/Stroke

98 x 127 mmReference

100 x 127 mmReference

Power

82.0 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2400Reference

2200Reference

Torque

367.1 NmReference

440.7 NmReference

Torque RPM

1450Reference

1400Reference

Engine (gross)

—

83.5 kWReference

Engine (net)

—

76.8 kWReference

Rated Power (net)

—

76.8 kWReference

Power (gross)

—

83.5 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dryReference

Starter

—

electricReference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Coolant capacity

—

17.5 LReference

Transmission

Gears

16 forward and 12 reverseReference

24 forward and reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Total flow

54.9 lpmReference

65.9 lpmReference

Rear lift

7198 kgReference

5000 kgReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

70.5 kWReference

Hydraulic system

—

50.0 LReference

Type

—

power shuttleReference

Capacity

—

50.0 LReference

SCV flow

—

37.9 lpmReference

Rear Type

—

IIReference

Control

—

electronic draft controlReference

Front lift

—

2500 kgReference

Rear PTO

—

independentReference

Clutch

—

wet discReference

Engine RPM

—

1000@2000Reference

Front PTO

—

independentReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

273 cmReference

234 cmReference

Weight

5248 kgReference

7780 to 8267 poundsReference

Front tire

12.4-28Reference

10.00-16Reference

Rear tire

16.9-38Reference

—

Ag front

12.4-28Reference

—

Ag rear

16.9-38Reference

—

Length

509 cmReference

414 cmReference

Height

279 cmReference

—

2WD Rear tire

—

16.9R38Reference

2WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 16.9R38Reference

4WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 13.6R28. Rear: 16.9R38Reference

Width

—

205 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

261 cmReference

2WD Weight

—

3529 kgReference

4WD Weight

—

3749 kgReference

Ground clearance

—

39 cmReference

Capacities

Fuel

—

127.2 LReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.