Compare/Massey Ferguson 2650LP vs Massey Ferguson 294C
Search

Massey Ferguson 2650LP vs Massey Ferguson 294C

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 2650LP vs Massey Ferguson 294C

The Massey Ferguson 2650LP and the Massey Ferguson 294C are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 74 hp. Massey Ferguson 294C is the lighter machine (3,915 kg vs 5,644 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 2650LP holds more fuel (100.3 L vs 79.9 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 2650LP is the newer design (2010 vs 1982). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Massey Ferguson 2650LP Tractor
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Massey Ferguson 294C Tractor
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
74 hp
74 hp
Confidence
98%
98%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Massey FergusonReference
Massey FergusonReference
Synchronized between gears 2-3 and between slow-fast ranges.Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Drive
4x4 MFWD 4WD (optional)Reference
crawlerReference
Differential lock
standardReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
mechanical dry clutchesReference
Final drives
bull gearReference
Engine
Fuel tank
100.3 LReference
79.9 LReference
Engine (gross)
55.2 kWReference
Displacement
4.4 LReference
4.1 LReference
Emissions
Tier IIIReference
Power (gross)
55.2 kWReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2100Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Engine
55.2 kWReference
Bore/Stroke
101 x 127 mmReference
Power
55.2 kWReference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
Torque
288.8 NmReference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter power
2.2 kWReference
Oil capacity
14.0 LReference
Coolant capacity
15.0 LReference
Transmission
Gears
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
8 forward and 4 reverseReference
Clutch
single dry discReference
280mm discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
46.2 kWReference
Type
partially synchronizedReference
gearReference
Valves
1 to 3Reference
Pump flow
54.9 lpmReference
46.2 lpmReference
Total flow
85.2 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
IIReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
1538 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540Reference
540 (1.375)Reference
Pressure
148.1 barReference
Control
position, response, and draft controlReference
Rear lift (at ends)
2399 kgReference
Engine RPM
540@1944Reference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
228 cmReference
Weight
5644 to 6217 poundsReference
3915 kgReference
Front tire
9.5L-15SLReference
Rear tire
16.9-24 (2WD)Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 12.5/80-18. Rear: 16.9-24 (4WD)Reference
Optional tires (ag)
Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 18.4-26 (4WD)Reference
Length
343 cmReference
309 cmReference
Width
199 cmReference
172 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
248 cmReference
Shipping weight
2820 kgReference
Clearance (drawbar)
27 cmReference
Height (hood)
133 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
212 cmReference
Ground clearance
34 cmReference
Gauge
132 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
45Reference
Battery AH
100Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)