Compare/Massey Ferguson 2660LP vs Massey Ferguson 4708

Massey Ferguson 2660LP vs Massey Ferguson 4708

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 2660LP vs Massey Ferguson 4708

The Massey Ferguson 2660LP and the Massey Ferguson 4708 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 4708 leads on rated power with 82 hp against 81 hp. Massey Ferguson 4708 is the lighter machine (3,430 kg vs 5,644 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 2660LP holds more fuel (100.3 L vs 82.1 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 4708 is the newer design (2015 vs 2010). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 4708 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 2660LP if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

81 hp

82 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference

Synchronized between gears 2-3 and between slow-fast ranges.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Drive

4x4 MFWD 4WD (optional)Reference

—

Differential lock

standardReference

—

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

Fuel tank

100.3 LReference

82.1 LReference

Engine (gross)

60.4 kWReference

61.1 kWReference

Displacement

4.4 LReference

Emissions

Tier IIIReference

Tier IIReference

Power (gross)

60.4 kWReference

61.1 kWReference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Fuel system

—

mechanical injectionReference

Torque

—

342.0 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1500Reference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

Gears

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

8 forward and reverseReference

Clutch

single dry discReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

52.2 kWReference

—

Type

partially synchronizedReference

mechanical shuttleReference

Valves

1 to 3Reference

1Reference

Pump flow

54.9 lpmReference

—

Total flow

85.2 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIReference

—

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

1538 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540Reference

540 (1.375)Reference

Pressure

—

200.0 barReference

Rear lift

—

3000 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

228 cmReference

235 cmReference

Weight

5644 to 6217 poundsReference

3430 kgReference

Front tire

9.5L-15SLReference

7.50-16Reference

Rear tire

18.4-26 (2WD)Reference

—

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 12.5/80-18 . Rear: (4WD)Reference

—

Optional tires (ag)

Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 18.4-26 (4WD)Reference

—

Length

343 cmReference

456 cmReference

Width

199 cmReference

—

Height (ROPS)

248 cmReference

259 cmReference

Shipping weight

2820 kgReference

—

Clearance (drawbar)

27 cmReference

—

2WD Rear tire

—

460/85R30Reference

2WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 7.50-16. Rear: 460/85R30Reference

4WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 340/85R24. Rear: 460/85R30Reference

Rear tread

—

156 to 192 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.