Compare/Massey Ferguson 2685 vs Massey Ferguson 6715S

Massey Ferguson 2685 vs Massey Ferguson 6715S

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 2685 vs Massey Ferguson 6715S

The Massey Ferguson 2685 and the Massey Ferguson 6715S are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 6715S leads on rated power with 132 hp against 130 hp. Massey Ferguson 2685 is the lighter machine (5,320 kg vs 6,999 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 6715S holds more fuel (253.6 L vs 213.1 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 6715S is the newer design (2017 vs 1985). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 6715S for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 2685 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

130 hp

132 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Pull at 3.56KPHReference

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Differential lock

—

electro-hydraulic front and rearReference

Trailer brakes

—

hydraulicReference

Engine

Fuel tank

213.1 LReference

253.6 LReference

Engine

96.9 kWReference

104.4 kWReference

Displacement

5.8 LReference

4.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

98 x 127 mmReference

108 x 134 mmReference

Power

96.9 kWReference

104.4 kWReference

Rated RPM

2400Reference

2100Reference

Torque

435.0 NmReference

744.4 NmReference

Torque RPM

1600Reference

1500Reference

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

—

29.9 LReference

Drawbar (tested)

—

92.9 kWReference

Emissions

—

Stage VReference

Emission control

—

SCR/DEF/DOCReference

Maximum Power

—

111.9 kWReference

Fuel system

—

high-pressure common rail direct injectionReference

Starter

—

electricReference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Max power

—

90.4 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

97.5 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

16 forward and 12 reverseReference

infinite forward and reverseReference

Transmission

—

Dyna-VTReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Total flow

54.9 lpmReference

—

Rear lift

7198 kgReference

—

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

96.9 kWReference

PTO (tested)

—

107.4 kWReference

Type

—

continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference

Pressure

—

200.0 barReference

Rear valves

—

5Reference

Front valves

—

2Reference

Pump flow

—

189.2 lpmReference

Rear Type

—

IIIReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

5100 kgReference

Rear PTO

—

independentReference

Clutch

—

wet discReference

Engine RPM

—

1000@1920Reference

Front PTO

—

independentReference

Front PTO Type

—

1000Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

106.2 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

273 cmReference

266 cmReference

Weight

5320 kgReference

6999 kgReference

Front tire

13.6-28Reference

—

Rear tire

18.4-38Reference

—

Ag front

13.6-28Reference

—

Ag rear

18.4-38Reference

—

Length

509 cmReference

492 cmReference

Height

290 cmReference

—

Width

—

182 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

302 cmReference

Variants

MT485E

—

similar Challenger modelReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Charging amps

—

240Reference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

—

33.7 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

6831 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.