Compare/Massey Ferguson 2725 vs Massey Ferguson 8240

Massey Ferguson 2725 vs Massey Ferguson 8240

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 2725 vs Massey Ferguson 8240

The Massey Ferguson 2725 and the Massey Ferguson 8240 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 2725 leads on rated power with 147 hp against 146 hp. Massey Ferguson 2725 is the lighter machine (5,470 kg vs 15,390 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 8240 holds more fuel (408.8 L vs 213.1 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 8240 is the newer design (1999 vs 1985). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 2725 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 8240 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

147 hp

146 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

liquid-cooledReference

Gear 3 used for pull test.Reference

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Original price

—

$79,500Reference

Engine

Fuel tank

213.1 LReference

408.8 LReference

Engine

109.6 kWReference

—

Displacement

5.8 LReference

6.6 LReference

Bore/Stroke

98 x 127 mmReference

108 x 120 mmReference

Power

109.6 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2400Reference

2200Reference

Torque

493.0 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1600Reference

—

Drawbar (tested)

—

105.2 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

—

16.5:1Reference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Max power

—

105.2 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

109.0 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

16 forward and 12 reverseReference

18 forward and 9 reverseReference

Clutch

—

wet discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Total flow

54.9 lpmReference

—

Rear lift

7198 kgReference

—

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

108.1 kWReference

PTO (tested)

—

115.7 kWReference

Type

—

full power shiftReference

Pressure

—

200.0 barReference

Valves

—

3 or 4Reference

Pump flow

—

147.6 lpmReference

Rear Type

—

IIIReference

Rear lift (at ends)

—

8700 kgReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

6350 kgReference

Rear PTO

—

independentReference

Engine RPM

—

1000@2090Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

113.8 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

273 cmReference

299 cmReference

Weight

5470 kgReference

15390 to 16305 poundsReference

Front tire

16.9-28Reference

11.00-16Reference

Rear tire

20.8-38Reference

20.8R-38Reference

Ag front

16.9-28Reference

11.00-16Reference

Ag rear

20.8-38Reference

20.8R-38Reference

Length

509 cmReference

490 cmReference

Height

293 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

—

307 cmReference

Height (exhaust)

—

312 cmReference

Operating weight

—

7395 kgReference

Clearance (drawbar)

—

43 cmReference

Massey Ferguson 8240 attachments

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Charging amps

—

120Reference

Batteries

—

2Reference

Battery CCA

—

950Reference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

—

34.1 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

6325 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.