Compare/Massey Ferguson 273 vs Massey Ferguson 575
Search

Massey Ferguson 273 vs Massey Ferguson 575

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 273 vs Massey Ferguson 575

The Massey Ferguson 273 and the Massey Ferguson 575 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 575 leads on rated power with 60 hp against 59 hp. Massey Ferguson 575 is the lighter machine (3,645 kg vs 5,390 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 575 holds more fuel (98.0 L vs 60.9 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 273 is the newer design (1983 vs 1976). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 575 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 273 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Massey Ferguson 273 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Massey Ferguson 575 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
59 hp
60 hp
Confidence
98%
98%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Massey FergusonReference
Massey FergusonReference
Four synchronized gears in three ranges, plus reverse range.Reference
Three gears in low and high ranges with two-speed Multi-Power power shift.Reference
Factories
Le Plessis-Robinson, FranceReference
Variants
6830
similar Landini modelReference
Engine
Fuel tank
60.9 LReference
98.0 LReference
Engine
44.0 kWReference
49.2 kWReference
Displacement
3.9 LReference
3.9 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 127 mmReference
98 x 127 mmReference
Power
44.0 kWReference
49.2 kWReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2000Reference
Torque
238.7 NmReference
255.1 NmReference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
1250Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
Compression
16:1Reference
Starter type
electricReference
Oil capacity
7.1 LReference
Coolant capacity
14.2 LReference
Transmission
Gears
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
Transmission
Multi-PowerReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Type
synchromeshReference
two-speed power shiftReference
Pressure
170.1 barReference
Pump flow
36.0 lpmReference
62.5 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
IIReference
Rear lift
2650 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
1000 (1.375)Reference
Engine RPM
1000@1916Reference
1000@1690Reference
PTO (claimed)
45.0 kWReference
Valves
2 or 3Reference
Control
position and draft controlReference
Rear lift (at ends)
1796 kgReference
Clutch
305mm dry discReference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
220 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
217 cmReference
Weight
5390 to 5954 poundsReference
3645 kgReference
Front tire
7.50-18Reference
7.50-18Reference
2WD Rear tire
16.9-30Reference
2WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 7.50-18. Rear: 16.9-30Reference
4WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 16.9-30Reference
2WD Length
366 cmReference
4WD Length
383 cmReference
Width
193 cmReference
207 cmReference
Height
221 cmReference
2WD Ground clearance
46 cmReference
4WD Ground clearance
40 cmReference
2WD
2444 kgReference
4WD
2700 kgReference
Wheelbase
224 cmReference
Rear tire
13.6-38Reference
2WD Ag front
7.50-18Reference
4WD Ag front
11.2-24Reference
Ag rear
13.6-38Reference
4WD Ag rear
16.9-34Reference
Length
368 cmReference
Height (cab)
257 cmReference
2WD Weight
3645 kgReference
Ground clearance
46 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
Capacities
Max capacity
4199 kgReference
575 Serial Numbers
1976
265001Reference
1977
265892Reference
1978
267645Reference
1979
269282Reference
1980
270028Reference
1981
271271Reference
1982
271595Reference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)