Compare/Massey Ferguson 274 vs Massey Ferguson 565

Massey Ferguson 274 vs Massey Ferguson 565

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 274 vs Massey Ferguson 565

The Massey Ferguson 274 and the Massey Ferguson 565 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 565 leads on rated power with 56 hp against 55 hp. Massey Ferguson 274 is the lighter machine (2,714 kg vs 2,769 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 565 holds more fuel (79.1 L vs 60.6 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 274 is the newer design (1982 vs 1977). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 565 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 274 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

55 hp

56 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Distributor

Massey FergusonReference

—

Manufacturer

LandiniReference

Massey FergusonReference

Four gears in three ranges, plus reverse range.Reference

Three gears in low and high ranges with two-speed Multi-Power power shift.Reference

Differential lock

mechanical rearReference

—

Variants

273

similar Massey Ferguson modelReference

—

6830

similar Landini modelReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

60.6 LReference

79.1 LReference

Drawbar (tested)

34.4 kWReference

—

Displacement

3.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

98 x 127 mmReference

Fuel system

direct injectionReference

—

Air cleaner

oil bathReference

dryReference

Compression

16:1Reference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

2000Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

—

Power at rated engine speed

41.3 kWReference

—

Max power

34.4 kWReference

—

Engine

—

44.7 kWReference

Power

—

44.7 kWReference

Torque

—

230.0 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

2000Reference

Starter type

—

electricReference

Oil capacity

—

7.1 LReference

Coolant capacity

—

14.2 LReference

Transmission

Gears

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

Clutch

11-inch dual dry discReference

hydraulic (independent)Reference

Transmission

—

Multi-PowerReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

41.0 kWReference

41.9 kWReference

PTO (tested)

41.3 kWReference

—

Type

synchromeshReference

two-speed power shiftReference

Valves

2Reference

—

Pump flow

35.6 lpmReference

36.0 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

Control

draft and position controlReference

position and draft controlReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

1664 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

independent optionalReference

Rear PTO Type

540 (1.375)Reference

1000 (1.375)Reference

Engine RPM

540@1944Reference

—

Front PTO

direct-driveReference

—

Front PTO Type

2250Reference

—

Power at rated PTO speed

40.5 kWReference

—

Pressure

—

137.9 barReference

Total flow

—

62.5 lpmReference

Rear lift (at ends)

—

1542 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

222 cmReference

224 cmReference

Weight

2714 kgReference

2769 kgReference

Front tire

11.2-24Reference

7.50-16Reference

Rear tire

16.9-30Reference

16.9/14-30Reference

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 16.9-30Reference

—

Operating weight

2714 kgReference

2769 kgReference

Ballasted weight

3714 kgReference

—

Clearance (front axle)

35 cmReference

—

Front tread

151 cmReference

—

Rear tread

149 to 200 cmReference

—

Ag front

—

6.00-19Reference

Ag rear

—

14.9/13-28Reference

Length

—

377 cmReference

Width

—

185 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

241 cmReference

Clearance (drawbar)

—

32 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

—

Test results

Fuel use

11.7 l/hourReference

—

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.