Compare/Massey Ferguson 293 vs Massey Ferguson 660

Massey Ferguson 293 vs Massey Ferguson 660

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 293 vs Massey Ferguson 660

The Massey Ferguson 293 and the Massey Ferguson 660 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 74 hp. Massey Ferguson 293 is the lighter machine (6,030 kg vs 13,228 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 660 holds more fuel (445.1 L vs 60.9 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 660 is the newer design (2003 vs 1983). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

74 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference

Four synchronized gears in three ranges, plus reverse range.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Variants

8830

similar Landini modelReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

60.9 LReference

445.1 LReference

Engine

55.0 kWReference

111.9 kWReference

Displacement

4.1 LReference

6.0 LReference

Bore/Stroke

101 x 127 mmReference

100 x 127 mmReference

Power

55.0 kWReference

111.9 kWReference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Torque

276.6 NmReference

554.6 NmReference

Torque RPM

1380Reference

1600Reference

Starter

electricReference

Starter volts

12Reference

Emissions

—

Tier 0Reference

Transmission

Gears

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

12 forward and 5 reverseReference

Clutch

—

330mm cerametallic discsReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Type

synchromeshReference

synchronizedReference

Pressure

170.1 barReference

210.0 barReference

Pump flow

36.0 lpmReference

60.2 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

Rear lift

2650 kgReference

5499 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540 (1.375)Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

Engine RPM

1000@1916Reference

1000@2160Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

54.8 kWReference

Control

—

position and draft controlReference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

224 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

220 cmReference

—

Weight

6030 to 6559 poundsReference

13228 to 14054 poundsReference

Front tire

7.50-20Reference

14.9-28Reference

2WD Rear tire

13.6-36Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 7.50-20. Rear: 13.6-36Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 12.4-24. Rear: 13.6-36Reference

—

4WD Optional tires (ag)

Front: 16.9-34. Rear: 13.6-38Reference

—

2WD Length

370 cmReference

—

4WD Length

377 cmReference

—

Width

193 cmReference

—

Height

235 cmReference

—

2WD Ground clearance

53 cmReference

—

4WD Ground clearance

41 cmReference

—

2WD

2735 kgReference

—

4WD

2975 kgReference

—

Wheelbase

—

294 cmReference

Rear tire

—

18.4-38Reference

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 14.9-28. Rear: 18.4-38Reference

Length

—

485 cmReference

Height (ROPS)

—

294 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

297 cmReference

ROPS Weight

—

6000 kgReference

Cab Weight

—

6374 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Capacities

Max capacity

5000 kgReference

—

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.