Compare/Massey Ferguson 295 vs Massey Ferguson 660

Massey Ferguson 295 vs Massey Ferguson 660

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 295 vs Massey Ferguson 660

The Massey Ferguson 295 and the Massey Ferguson 660 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 74 hp. Massey Ferguson 295 is the lighter machine (3,800 kg vs 13,228 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 660 holds more fuel (445.1 L vs 152.9 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 660 is the newer design (2003 vs 1978). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

74 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference

With 18.4x34 rear tires.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Engine

Fuel tank

152.9 LReference

445.1 LReference

Engine

78.3 kWReference

111.9 kWReference

Displacement

5.9 LReference

6.0 LReference

Bore/Stroke

104 x 114 mmReference

100 x 127 mmReference

Power

78.3 kWReference

111.9 kWReference

Fuel system

direct injectionReference

—

Air cleaner

dual dry elementReference

—

Compression

14:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Torque

350.1 NmReference

554.6 NmReference

Torque RPM

1400Reference

1600Reference

Starter

electricReference

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

38.0 LReference

—

Coolant capacity

22.1 LReference

—

Emissions

—

Tier 0Reference

Transmission

Gears

8 forward and 2 reverseReference

12 forward and 5 reverseReference

Clutch

330mm cerametallic discReference

330mm cerametallic discsReference

Type

—

synchronizedReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

55.2 kWReference

54.8 kWReference

Pressure

206.0 barReference

210.0 barReference

Pump flow

17.0 lpmReference

60.2 lpmReference

Rear lift

2500 kgReference

5499 kgReference

Rear PTO Type

540 (1.375)Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

Engine RPM

540@1700Reference

1000@2160Reference

Rear Type

—

IIReference

Control

—

position and draft controlReference

Rear PTO

—

independentReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

247 cmReference

294 cmReference

Weight

3800 kgReference

13228 to 14054 poundsReference

Front tire

9.00x16Reference

14.9-28Reference

Rear tire

18.4/15-34Reference

18.4-38Reference

Ag front

9.00x16Reference

—

Ag rear

23.1/18-26Reference

—

Length

414 cmReference

485 cmReference

Height (steering wheel)

180 cmReference

—

Front tread

137 to 199 cmReference

—

Rear tread

141 to 233 cmReference

—

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 14.9-28. Rear: 18.4-38Reference

Height (ROPS)

—

294 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

297 cmReference

ROPS Weight

—

6000 kgReference

Cab Weight

—

6374 kgReference

Electrical

Charging system

alternatorReference

—

Charging amps

35Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Battery AH

135Reference

—

Ground

—

negativeReference

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.