Compare/Massey Ferguson 3075 vs Massey Ferguson 595

Massey Ferguson 3075 vs Massey Ferguson 595

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 3075 vs Massey Ferguson 595

The Massey Ferguson 3075 and the Massey Ferguson 595 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 595 leads on rated power with 87 hp against 86 hp. Massey Ferguson 3075 is the lighter machine (8,950 kg vs 9,040 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 3075 holds more fuel (174.1 L vs 127.9 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 3075 is the newer design (1993 vs 1974). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 595 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 3075 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

86 hp

87 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

Gear 3TA used for pull test.Reference

By 1980, Massey Ferguson model 595 tractors sold in certain markets were equipped with turbochargers.Reference

Final drives

—

outboard planetaryReference

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

Fuel tank

174.1 LReference

127.9 LReference

Engine

70.8 kWReference

64.7 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

60.8 kWReference

—

Displacement

4.0 LReference

5.2 LReference

Bore/Stroke

100 x 127 mmReference

114 x 127 mmReference

Power

70.8 kWReference

64.7 kWReference

Compression

16:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

2000Reference

Coolant capacity

19.3 LReference

—

Max power

60.8 kWReference

—

Power at rated engine speed

64.2 kWReference

—

Torque

—

343.1 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1300Reference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Transmission

Gears

32 forward and reverseReference

8 forward and 2 reverseReference

Transmission

DynashiftReference

Multi-PowerReference

Type

four-speed power shiftReference

partial power shiftReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (tested)

66.9 kWReference

—

Valves

2Reference

—

Pump flow

60.2 lpmReference

25.4 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

2Reference

Rear lift

3311 kgReference

2449 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

1000 (1.375)Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

66.3 kWReference

—

Pressure

—

165.5 barReference

Control

—

position and draft control with top-link sensingReference

Clutch

—

305mm dry discReference

Engine RPM

—

1000@2000Reference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

255 cmReference

260 cmReference

Weight

8950 to 9900 poundsReference

4490 kgReference

Front tire

14.9R24Reference

11.00-16Reference

Rear tire

18.4R34Reference

16.9-38 (2WD)Reference

Ag front

14.9R24Reference

—

Ag rear

18.4R34Reference

—

2WD Weight

4059 kgReference

—

4WD Weight

4490 kgReference

—

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 12.4-28. Rear: 16.9-38 (4WD)Reference

Length

—

446 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

262 cmReference

Massey Ferguson 3075 attachments

Test results

Fuel use

20.1 l/hourReference

—

Max pull

4175 kgReference

—

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.