Compare/Massey Ferguson 3075 vs Massey Ferguson 699

Massey Ferguson 3075 vs Massey Ferguson 699

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 3075 vs Massey Ferguson 699

The Massey Ferguson 3075 and the Massey Ferguson 699 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 86 hp. Massey Ferguson 699 is the lighter machine (8,304 kg vs 8,950 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 3075 holds more fuel (174.1 L vs 145.0 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 3075 is the newer design (1993 vs 1984). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

86 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

Gear 3TA used for pull test.Reference

Gear 2HL used for pull test.Reference

Final drives

—

planetaryReference

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Engine

Fuel tank

174.1 LReference

145.0 LReference

Engine

70.8 kWReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

60.8 kWReference

51.7 kWReference

Displacement

4.0 LReference

5.8 LReference

Bore/Stroke

100 x 127 mmReference

98 x 127 mmReference

Power

70.8 kWReference

—

Compression

16:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Coolant capacity

19.3 LReference

—

Max power

60.8 kWReference

51.7 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

64.2 kWReference

64.0 kWReference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Transmission

Gears

32 forward and reverseReference

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

Transmission

DynashiftReference

—

Type

four-speed power shiftReference

synchromeshReference

Clutch

—

dry discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (tested)

66.9 kWReference

64.0 kWReference

Valves

2Reference

2 or 3Reference

Pump flow

60.2 lpmReference

26.5 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

Rear lift

3311 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

66.3 kWReference

58.2 kWReference

PTO (claimed)

—

63.4 kWReference

Pressure

—

172.4 barReference

Total flow

—

64.3 lpmReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

2385 kgReference

Engine RPM

—

1000@1900Reference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

255 cmReference

258 cmReference

Weight

8950 to 9900 poundsReference

8304 to 10325 poundsReference

Front tire

14.9R24Reference

10.00-16Reference

Rear tire

18.4R34Reference

—

Ag front

14.9R24Reference

—

Ag rear

18.4R34Reference

—

2WD Weight

4059 kgReference

—

4WD Weight

4490 kgReference

—

2WD Rear tire

—

18.4-34Reference

2WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 18.4-34Reference

4WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 14.9-24. Rear: 18.4-34Reference

Length

—

432 cmReference

Width

—

205 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

271 cmReference

2WD Front tread

—

162 to 195 cmReference

4WD Front tread

—

167 to 187 cmReference

Rear tread

—

152 to 243 cmReference

2WD ROPS Shipping

—

3766 kgReference

2WD Cab Shipping

—

4129 kgReference

4WD ROPS Shipping

—

4207 kgReference

4WD Cab Shipping

—

4570 kgReference

Operating

—

4683 kgReference

Ballasted

—

5867 kgReference

Massey Ferguson 3075 attachments

Test results

Fuel use

20.1 l/hourReference

19.7 l/hourReference

Max pull

4175 kgReference

3954 kgReference

Variants

699

—

2WDReference

699-4

—

4WDReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Charging amps

—

55Reference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.