Compare/Massey Ferguson 3308 vs Massey Ferguson 595

Massey Ferguson 3308 vs Massey Ferguson 595

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 3308 vs Massey Ferguson 595

The Massey Ferguson 3308 and the Massey Ferguson 595 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 595 leads on rated power with 87 hp against 86 hp. Massey Ferguson 3308 is the lighter machine (6,074 kg vs 9,040 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 595 holds more fuel (127.9 L vs 85.2 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 3308 is the newer design (2021 vs 1974). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 595 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 3308 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

86 hp

87 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

liquid-cooledReference

By 1980, Massey Ferguson model 595 tractors sold in certain markets were equipped with turbochargers.Reference

Final drives

—

outboard planetaryReference

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

Fuel tank

85.2 LReference

127.9 LReference

Engine

64.1 kWReference

64.7 kWReference

Displacement

3.3 LReference

5.2 LReference

Bore/Stroke

108 x 120 mmReference

114 x 127 mmReference

Power

64.1 kWReference

64.7 kWReference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

2000Reference

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Torque

—

343.1 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1300Reference

Transmission

Gears

18 forward and 4 reverseReference

8 forward and 2 reverseReference

Type

creeperReference

partial power shiftReference

Transmission

—

Multi-PowerReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Pressure

180.0 barReference

165.5 barReference

Pump flow

59.0 lpmReference

25.4 lpmReference

Steering flow

31.0 lpmReference

—

Control

II/IReference

position and draft control with top-link sensingReference

Rear lift

2100 kgReference

2449 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

mechanical discReference

305mm dry discReference

Rear PTO Type

540 (1.375)Reference

1000 (1.375)Reference

Engine RPM

540@1900Reference

1000@2000Reference

Rear Type

—

2Reference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

230 cmReference

260 cmReference

Weight

6074 to 6715 poundsReference

4490 kgReference

Front tire

7.50-16Reference

11.00-16Reference

2WD Rear tire

16.9x24Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 7.50-16. Rear: 16.9x24Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 250/80-18. Rear: 16.9x24Reference

—

Length

376 cmReference

446 cmReference

Height (ROPS)

232 cmReference

—

Height (Folded ROPS)

161 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

235 cmReference

262 cmReference

Clearance (drawbar)

29 cmReference

—

2WD ROPS

2755 kgReference

—

4WD ROPS

2899 kgReference

—

4WD Cab

3045 kgReference

—

Rear tire

—

16.9-38 (2WD)Reference

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 12.4-28. Rear: 16.9-38 (4WD)Reference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

—

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.