Compare/Massey Ferguson 3308 vs Massey Ferguson 699

Massey Ferguson 3308 vs Massey Ferguson 699

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 3308 vs Massey Ferguson 699

The Massey Ferguson 3308 and the Massey Ferguson 699 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 86 hp. Massey Ferguson 3308 is the lighter machine (6,074 kg vs 8,304 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 699 holds more fuel (145.0 L vs 85.2 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 3308 is the newer design (2021 vs 1984). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

86 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

liquid-cooledReference

Gear 2HL used for pull test.Reference

Final drives

—

planetaryReference

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Engine

Fuel tank

85.2 LReference

145.0 LReference

Engine

64.1 kWReference

—

Displacement

3.3 LReference

5.8 LReference

Bore/Stroke

108 x 120 mmReference

98 x 127 mmReference

Power

64.1 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Drawbar (tested)

—

51.7 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

64.0 kWReference

Max power

—

51.7 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

18 forward and 4 reverseReference

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

Type

creeperReference

synchromeshReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Pressure

180.0 barReference

172.4 barReference

Pump flow

59.0 lpmReference

26.5 lpmReference

Steering flow

31.0 lpmReference

—

Control

II/IReference

—

Rear lift

2100 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

mechanical discReference

dry discReference

Rear PTO Type

540 (1.375)Reference

540/1000Reference

Engine RPM

540@1900Reference

1000@1900Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

63.4 kWReference

PTO (tested)

—

64.0 kWReference

Valves

—

2 or 3Reference

Total flow

—

64.3 lpmReference

Rear Type

—

IIReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

2385 kgReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

58.2 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

230 cmReference

258 cmReference

Weight

6074 to 6715 poundsReference

8304 to 10325 poundsReference

Front tire

7.50-16Reference

10.00-16Reference

2WD Rear tire

16.9x24Reference

18.4-34Reference

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 7.50-16. Rear: 16.9x24Reference

Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 18.4-34Reference

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 250/80-18. Rear: 16.9x24Reference

Front: 14.9-24. Rear: 18.4-34Reference

Length

376 cmReference

432 cmReference

Height (ROPS)

232 cmReference

—

Height (Folded ROPS)

161 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

235 cmReference

271 cmReference

Clearance (drawbar)

29 cmReference

—

2WD ROPS

2755 kgReference

—

4WD ROPS

2899 kgReference

—

4WD Cab

3045 kgReference

—

Width

—

205 cmReference

2WD Front tread

—

162 to 195 cmReference

4WD Front tread

—

167 to 187 cmReference

Rear tread

—

152 to 243 cmReference

2WD ROPS Shipping

—

3766 kgReference

2WD Cab Shipping

—

4129 kgReference

4WD ROPS Shipping

—

4207 kgReference

4WD Cab Shipping

—

4570 kgReference

Operating

—

4683 kgReference

Ballasted

—

5867 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Charging amps

—

55Reference

Variants

699

—

2WDReference

699-4

—

4WDReference

Test results

Fuel use

—

19.7 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

3954 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.