Compare/Massey Ferguson 3670 vs Massey Ferguson 8130

Massey Ferguson 3670 vs Massey Ferguson 8130

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 3670 vs Massey Ferguson 8130

The Massey Ferguson 3670 and the Massey Ferguson 8130 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 8130 leads on rated power with 155 hp against 154 hp. Massey Ferguson 8130 is the lighter machine (6,041 kg vs 12,736 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 8130 is the newer design (1995 vs 1992). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 8130 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 3670 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

154 hp

155 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

Four synchronized gears with two-speed high-low and a four-speed power shift. The Dynashift was introduced for the 1993 model year as the standard transmission.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Original price

$68,100 (1994)Reference

—

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

Displacement

6.6 LReference

6.0 LReference

Bore/Stroke

108 x 120 mmReference

100 x 127 mmReference

Cooling system

viscous fanReference

—

Air cleaner

dryReference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

20.8 LReference

—

Coolant capacity

26.9 LReference

—

Engine

—

115.6 kWReference

Power

—

115.6 kWReference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

DynashiftReference

Type

four-speed power shiftReference

—

Gears

32 forward and reverseReference

Clutch

310mm discReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

114.8 kWReference

—

Hydraulic system

74.9 LReference

—

Capacity

74.9 LReference

—

Pressure

180.0 barReference

—

Valves

2 or 3Reference

—

Pump flow

50.0 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIReference

Control

position and electronic draft controlReference

—

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

4536 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

1000Reference

540/1000Reference

Rear lift

—

7801 kgReference

Capacities

Fuel

306.6 LReference

—

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

293 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

292 cmReference

—

Weight

12736 to 13816 poundsReference

6041 kgReference

Front tire

14L-16Reference

16.9R28Reference

Rear tire

20.8R38 (2WD)Reference

20.8R38Reference

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 16.9R28. Rear: 20.8R38 (4WD)Reference

Front: 16.9R28. Rear: 20.8R38Reference

2WD Length

539 cmReference

—

4WD Length

537 cmReference

—

Width

240 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

289 cmReference

291 cmReference

2WD Weight

5777 kgReference

—

4WD Weight

6266 kgReference

—

Ground clearance

43 cmReference

—

Wheelbase

—

276 cmReference

Length

—

508 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.