Compare/Massey Ferguson 374GE vs Massey Ferguson 565

Massey Ferguson 374GE vs Massey Ferguson 565

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 374GE vs Massey Ferguson 565

The Massey Ferguson 374GE and the Massey Ferguson 565 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 374GE leads on rated power with 57 hp against 56 hp. Massey Ferguson 565 is the lighter machine (2,769 kg vs 4,895 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 565 holds more fuel (79.1 L vs 45.4 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 374GE is the newer design (1994 vs 1977). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 374GE for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 565 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

57 hp

56 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

liquid-cooledReference

Three gears in low and high ranges with two-speed Multi-Power power shift.Reference

Variants

374S

narrowReference

—

374F

narrowReference

—

374GE

low-profileReference

—

374V

ultra-narrowReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

45.4 LReference

79.1 LReference

Displacement

3.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

98 x 127 mmReference

Air cleaner

dryReference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

2000Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

—

Engine

—

44.7 kWReference

Power

—

44.7 kWReference

Compression

—

16:1Reference

Torque

—

230.0 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

2000Reference

Starter type

—

electricReference

Oil capacity

—

7.1 LReference

Coolant capacity

—

14.2 LReference

Transmission

Type

creeperReference

two-speed power shiftReference

Gears

24 forward and 12 reverseReference

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

Clutch

305mm dry discReference

hydraulic (independent)Reference

Transmission

—

Multi-PowerReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

42.5 kWReference

41.9 kWReference

Rear valves

2Reference

—

Front valves

3Reference

—

Pump flow

54.1 lpmReference

36.0 lpmReference

Rear Type

II/IReference

IIReference

Rear lift (at ends)

2600 kgReference

1542 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

independent optionalReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

1000 (1.375)Reference

Engine RPM

540@1960Reference

—

Pressure

—

137.9 barReference

Total flow

—

62.5 lpmReference

Control

—

position and draft controlReference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

207 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

201 cmReference

—

Weight

4895 to 5248 poundsReference

2769 kgReference

Front tire

9.00-10Reference

7.50-16Reference

2WD Rear tire

14.9LR20Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 9.00-10. Rear: 14.9LR20Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 9.0/75-16. Rear: 14.9LR20Reference

—

Length

344 cmReference

377 cmReference

Width

137 cmReference

185 cmReference

Height (steering wheel)

137 cmReference

—

Height (hood)

123 cmReference

—

2WD Weight

2220 kgReference

—

4WD Weight

2380 kgReference

—

Clearance (drawbar)

36 cmReference

32 cmReference

2WD Front tread

108 to 149 cmReference

—

4WD Front tread

107 to 137 cmReference

—

Rear tread

98 to 129 cmReference

—

Wheelbase

—

224 cmReference

Rear tire

—

16.9/14-30Reference

Ag front

—

6.00-19Reference

Ag rear

—

14.9/13-28Reference

Height (cab)

—

241 cmReference

Operating weight

—

2769 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

—

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.