Compare/Massey Ferguson 396 vs Massey Ferguson 699
Search

Massey Ferguson 396 vs Massey Ferguson 699

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 396 vs Massey Ferguson 699

The Massey Ferguson 396 and the Massey Ferguson 699 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 699 leads on rated power with 86 hp against 85 hp. Massey Ferguson 396 is the lighter machine (7,180 kg vs 8,304 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 396 is the newer design (1992 vs 1984). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 699 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 396 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Massey Ferguson 396 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Massey Ferguson 699 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
85 hp
86 hp
Confidence
98%
98%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Massey FergusonReference
Massey FergusonReference
Drawbar performanceReference
Gear 2HL used for pull test.Reference
Final drives
planetaryReference
Differential lock
mechanical rearReference
Engine
Engine
77.6 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
53.3 kWReference
51.7 kWReference
Displacement
6.0 LReference
5.8 LReference
Bore/Stroke
99 x 127 mmReference
98 x 127 mmReference
Power
77.6 kWReference
Compression
15.5:1Reference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Coolant capacity
20.1 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
63.1 kWReference
64.0 kWReference
Max power
53.3 kWReference
51.7 kWReference
Fuel tank
145.0 LReference
Transmission
Gears
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
Clutch
dry discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
65.6 kWReference
63.4 kWReference
PTO (tested)
63.1 kWReference
64.0 kWReference
Hydraulic system
47.3 LReference
Type
synchromeshReference
synchromeshReference
Capacity
47.3 LReference
Valves
2Reference
2 or 3Reference
Pump flow
63.2 lpmReference
26.5 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
IIReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000Reference
540/1000Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
59.2 kWReference
58.2 kWReference
Pressure
172.4 barReference
Total flow
64.3 lpmReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
2385 kgReference
Engine RPM
1000@1900Reference
Capacities
Fuel
126.0 LReference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
257 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
263 cmReference
Weight
7180 to 8340 poundsReference
8304 to 10325 poundsReference
Front tire
10.00-16Reference
10.00-16Reference
Rear tire
18.4-34Reference
Ag front
10.00-16Reference
Ag rear
18.4-34Reference
2WD Length
415 cmReference
4WD Length
429 cmReference
Width
221 cmReference
205 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
256 cmReference
Height (cab)
273 cmReference
271 cmReference
2WD ROPS
3256 kgReference
4WD ROPS
3488 kgReference
2WD Cab
3552 kgReference
4WD Cab
3783 kgReference
Wheelbase
258 cmReference
2WD Rear tire
18.4-34Reference
2WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 18.4-34Reference
4WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 14.9-24. Rear: 18.4-34Reference
Length
432 cmReference
2WD Front tread
162 to 195 cmReference
4WD Front tread
167 to 187 cmReference
Rear tread
152 to 243 cmReference
2WD ROPS Shipping
3766 kgReference
2WD Cab Shipping
4129 kgReference
4WD ROPS Shipping
4207 kgReference
4WD Cab Shipping
4570 kgReference
Operating
4683 kgReference
Ballasted
5867 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
55Reference
Test results
Fuel use
17.4 l/hourReference
19.7 l/hourReference
Max pull
3447 kgReference
3954 kgReference
Variants
699
2WDReference
699-4
4WDReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)