Compare/Massey Ferguson 420 vs Massey Ferguson 563
Search

Massey Ferguson 420 vs Massey Ferguson 563

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 420 vs Massey Ferguson 563

The Massey Ferguson 420 and the Massey Ferguson 563 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 64 hp. Massey Ferguson 563 is the lighter machine (4,962 kg vs 5,016 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 563 is the newer design (2006 vs 2004). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Massey Ferguson 420 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Massey Ferguson 563 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
64 hp
64 hp
Confidence
98%
98%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Massey FergusonReference
Massey FergusonReference
liquid-cooled inlineReference
liquid-cooledReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
Trailer brakes
hydraulic (optional)Reference
Final drives
planetaryReference
Engine
Engine
47.7 kWReference
Displacement
3.3 LReference
3.3 LReference
Bore/Stroke
105 x 127 mmReference
105 x 127 mmReference
Power
47.7 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual dry elementReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Torque
270.0 NmReference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Engine (gross)
47.7 kWReference
Power (gross)
47.7 kWReference
Oil capacity
6.8 LReference
Coolant capacity
10.0 LReference
Transmission
Type
synchro shuttleReference
open centerReference
Gears
8 forward and reverseReference
8 forward and reverseReference
Clutch
305mm cerametalicReference
305mm dry discReference
Transmission
shuttleReference
Capacities
Fuel
48.1 LReference
48.1 LReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Hydraulic system
42.0 LReference
34.8 LReference
Capacity
42.0 LReference
34.8 LReference
Pressure
175.0 barReference
Valves
1 or 2Reference
2Reference
Pump flow
52.6 lpmReference
50.7 lpmReference
Rear Type
2/1Reference
I/IIReference
Control
draft, position and response controlReference
Rear lift (at ends)
1789 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540Reference
Engine RPM
540@1789Reference
PTO (claimed)
41.0 kWReference
Total flow
71.5 lpmReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
1229 kgReference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
205 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
212 cmReference
Weight
5016 to 6338 poundsReference
4962 to 5456 poundsReference
Front tire
6.00-16Reference
9.5L-15Reference
Rear tire
13.6-28 (2WD)Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 280/70R20. Rear: 13.6-28 (4WD)Reference
2WD Length
351 cmReference
4WD Length
357 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
237 cmReference
Height (Folded ROPS)
181 cmReference
Height (cab)
237 cmReference
2WD ROPS Operating
2275 kgReference
2WD cab Operating
2505 kgReference
4WD ROPS Operating
2575 kgReference
4WD cab Operating
2874 kgReference
Wheelbase
194 cmReference
2WD Rear tire
14.9-24Reference
2WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 9.5L-15. Rear: 14.9-24Reference
4WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 12.5/80-18. Rear: 14.9-24Reference
Length
322 cmReference
Width
169 cmReference
Height
234 cmReference
2WD Shipping weight
2250 kgReference
4WD Shipping weight
2474 kgReference
Ground clearance
33 cmReference
2WD Front tread
124 to 175 cmReference
4WD Front tread
121 to 162 cmReference
Rear tread
132 to 193 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)