Compare/Massey Ferguson 4780 vs Massey Ferguson 9240

Massey Ferguson 4780 vs Massey Ferguson 9240

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 4780 vs Massey Ferguson 9240

The Massey Ferguson 4780 and the Massey Ferguson 9240 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 4780 leads on rated power with 215 hp against 210 hp. Massey Ferguson 9240 is the lighter machine (9,013 kg vs 9,348 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 9240 is the newer design (1995 vs 1983). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 4780 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 9240 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

215 hp

210 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Distributor

Massey FergusonReference

—

Manufacturer

MÃ¼llerReference

Massey FergusonReference

With 23.1/18-30 tires.Reference

Gear 8 used for power test.Reference

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

160.3 kWReference

—

Displacement

11.0 LReference

8.3 LReference

Bore/Stroke

127 x 145 mmReference

114 x 135 mmReference

Power

160.3 kWReference

—

Fuel system

direct injectionReference

—

Air cleaner

dual dryReference

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

16:1Reference

16.5:1Reference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Torque

774.8 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1500Reference

—

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

25.0 LReference

—

Coolant capacity

54.0 LReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

—

130.9 kWReference

Max power

—

130.9 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

156.3 kWReference

Transmission

Type

constant meshReference

full powershiftReference

Gears

10 forward and 2 reverseReference

18 forward and 9 reverseReference

Clutch

356mm cerametallic dry discReference

—

Capacities

Fuel

559.8 LReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

Hydraulic system

99.9 LReference

—

Capacity

99.9 LReference

—

Pressure

143.2 barReference

—

Valves

2Reference

—

Pump flow

68.9 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIIReference

Rear lift

5298 kgReference

—

PTO (tested)

—

168.8 kWReference

Rear PTO Type

—

1000Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

163.4 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

299 cmReference

292 cmReference

Weight

9348 kgReference

9013 kgReference

Front tire

18.4/15x34Reference

—

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 23.1/18x26. Rear:Reference

—

Optional tires (ag)

Front: 23.1/18x26. Rear:Reference

—

Ag front

23.1/18x30Reference

—

Ag rear

23.1/18x30Reference

—

Length

586 cmReference

—

Width

274 cmReference

—

Height

343 cmReference

—

Shipping weight

9348 kgReference

—

Operating weight

—

9013 kgReference

Ballasted weight

—

10242 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

—

Charging system

alternatorReference

—

Charging amps

55Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

—

Battery AH

165Reference

—

Speeds

Test results

Fuel use

—

49.2 l/hourReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.