Search
Massey Ferguson 5150 vs Massey Ferguson 8732S
Verdict: Massey Ferguson 5150 vs Massey Ferguson 8732S
The Massey Ferguson 5150 and the Massey Ferguson 8732S are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 8732S leads on rated power with 264 hp against 250 hp. Massey Ferguson 8732S holds more fuel (629.8 L vs 604.8 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 8732S is the newer design (2018 vs 1998). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 8732S for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 5150 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
250 hp
264 hp
Confidence
98%
98%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
Massey FergusonReference
Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Pull at 2.35KPHReference
Factories
—
Beauvais, FranceReference
Trailer brakes
—
hydraulicReference
Engine
Fuel tank
604.8 LReference
629.8 LReference
Engine
186.4 kWReference
238.6 kWReference
Displacement
8.3 LReference
8.4 LReference
Bore/Stroke
114 x 135 mmReference
111 x 145 mmReference
Power
186.4 kWReference
238.6 kWReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
1950Reference
Torque
980.4 NmReference
1389.9 NmReference
Torque RPM
1500Reference
1500Reference
Starter
electricReference
electricReference
Starter volts
24Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
24.0 LReference
—
Coolant capacity
12.3 LReference
—
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
—
60.0 LReference
Drawbar (tested)
—
173.5 kWReference
Emissions
—
Stage IVReference
Emission control
—
selective-catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference
Oil change
—
500 hReference
Max power
—
173.5 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
—
196.8 kWReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Pressure
156.9 barReference
200.0 barReference
Valves
4Reference
—
Pump flow
160.1 lpmReference
205.1 lpmReference
Steering flow
36.0 lpmReference
—
Rear Type
IIIReference
IVReference
PTO (claimed)
—
205.1 kWReference
PTO (tested)
—
212.4 kWReference
Type
—
continuously-variable transmissionReference
Rear valves
—
6Reference
Front valves
—
2Reference
Rear lift (at ends)
—
11999 kgReference
Front Hitch
—
IIIReference
Front lift (at ends)
—
5000 kgReference
Rear PTO
—
independentReference
Clutch
—
electro-hydraulicReference
Rear PTO Type
—
1000 (1.75)Reference
Engine RPM
—
1000@2036Reference
Front PTO
—
independentReference
Front PTO Type
—
1000Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
—
210.4 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
314 cmReference
310 cmReference
Weight
10800 kgReference
10800 kgReference
Front tire
18-4x38Reference
620/75R30Reference
Rear tire
18-4x38Reference
650/85R42Reference
Ag front
24.5x32Reference
—
Ag rear
24.5-32Reference
—
Length
690 cmReference
555 cmReference
Width
329 cmReference
—
Height
340 cmReference
—
Ground clearance
40 cmReference
—
Standard tires (ag)
—
Front: 650/60R34. Rear: 900/60R42Reference
Height (cab)
—
351 cmReference
Max weight
—
18000 kgReference
Front axle
—
Quadlink suspensionReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Batteries
2Reference
—
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging system
—
alternatorReference
Transmission
Transmission
—
Dyna-VTReference
Gears
—
infinite forward and reverseReference
Test results
Fuel use
—
58.3 l/hourReference
Max pull
—
10196 kgReference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.