Compare/Massey Ferguson 5285 vs Massey Ferguson 98

Massey Ferguson 5285 vs Massey Ferguson 98

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 5285 vs Massey Ferguson 98

The Massey Ferguson 5285 and the Massey Ferguson 98 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 5285 leads on rated power with 85 hp against 84 hp. Massey Ferguson 98 is the lighter machine (6,804 kg vs 7,495 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 5285 is the newer design (2002 vs 1960). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 5285 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 98 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

85 hp

84 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference

OliverReference

With 18.4-34 rear tires.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Final drives

planetaryReference

—

Differential lock

mechanical rearReference

—

Distributor

—

Massey FergusonReference

Engine

63.4 kWReference

—

Displacement

4.1 LReference

3.5 LReference

Bore/Stroke

101 x 127 mmReference

—

Power

63.4 kWReference

—

Air cleaner

dual element dryReference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

1675Reference

Torque

288.0 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1200Reference

—

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

—

Oil capacity

9.5 LReference

—

Drawbar (claimed)

—

45.6 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

6 forward and 2 reverseReference

Capacities

Fuel

99.9 LReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

Hydraulic system

37.9 LReference

—

Type

open centerReference

gearReference

Capacity

37.9 LReference

—

Pressure

150.0 barReference

—

Valves

0 to 2Reference

1Reference

Total flow

42.0 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIReference

—

Control

position and depth controlReference

—

Rear lift

2500 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

liveReference

Clutch

330mm dry discReference

—

Rear PTO Type

540 (1.375)Reference

540Reference

Engine RPM

540@1900Reference

—

PTO (claimed)

—

62.7 kWReference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

213 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

211 cmReference

—

Weight

7495 to 7826 poundsReference

6804 kgReference

Length

399 cmReference

—

Height

264 cmReference

—

2WD Weight

3399 kgReference

—

4WD Weight

3549 kgReference

—

2WD Ground clearance

36 cmReference

—

4WD Ground clearance

34 cmReference

—

2WD Front tread

130 to 210 cmReference

—

4WD Front tread

164 to 203 cmReference

—

Rear tread

155 to 216 cmReference

—

Front tire

—

7.50-18Reference

Rear tire

—

15-34Reference

Ag front

—

7.50-18Reference

Ag rear

—

15-34Reference

Operating weight

—

6804 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

—

Charging system

alternatorReference

—

Charging amps

35Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

—

Battery AH

90Reference

—

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.