Compare/Massey Ferguson 565 vs Massey Ferguson 670

Massey Ferguson 565 vs Massey Ferguson 670

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 565 vs Massey Ferguson 670

The Massey Ferguson 565 and the Massey Ferguson 670 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 56 hp. Massey Ferguson 565 is the lighter machine (2,769 kg vs 3,955 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 565 holds more fuel (79.1 L vs 71.9 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 670 is the newer design (1983 vs 1977). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

56 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

Three gears in low and high ranges with two-speed Multi-Power power shift.Reference

With 15.8-38 rear tires.Reference

Final drives

—

outboard planetaryReference

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Engine

Fuel tank

79.1 LReference

71.9 LReference

Engine

44.7 kWReference

—

Displacement

3.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

98 x 127 mmReference

Power

44.7 kWReference

—

Air cleaner

dryReference

dual dry elementReference

Compression

16:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2000Reference

Torque

230.0 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

2000Reference

—

Starter type

electricReference

—

Oil capacity

7.1 LReference

—

Coolant capacity

14.2 LReference

—

Drawbar (claimed)

—

34.3 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

—

34.5 kWReference

Fuel system

—

direct injectionReference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Power at rated engine speed

—

41.5 kWReference

Max power

—

34.5 kWReference

Transmission

Type

two-speed power shiftReference

open centerReference

Gears

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

Transmission

Multi-PowerReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

41.9 kWReference

41.8 kWReference

Pressure

137.9 barReference

—

Pump flow

36.0 lpmReference

26.5 lpmReference

Total flow

62.5 lpmReference

64.3 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

Control

position and draft controlReference

Rear lift (at ends)

1542 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independent optionalReference

independentReference

Clutch

hydraulic (independent)Reference

304mm dry discReference

Rear PTO Type

1000 (1.375)Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

PTO (tested)

—

41.5 kWReference

Valves

—

2 or 3Reference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

2013 kgReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

38.4 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

224 cmReference

228 cmReference

Weight

2769 kgReference

3955 kgReference

Front tire

7.50-16Reference

Rear tire

16.9/14-30Reference

—

Ag front

6.00-19Reference

—

Ag rear

14.9/13-28Reference

—

Length

377 cmReference

391 cmReference

Width

185 cmReference

205 cmReference

Height (cab)

241 cmReference

—

Operating weight

2769 kgReference

3955 kgReference

Clearance (drawbar)

32 cmReference

—

2WD Rear tire

—

15.5-38Reference

2WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 7.50-16. Rear: 15.5-38Reference

4WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 16.9-30Reference

Ballasted weight

—

4173 kgReference

2WD Front tread

—

137 to 177 cmReference

4WD Front tread

—

147 to 177 cmReference

2WD Rear tread

—

152 to 228 cmReference

4WD Rear tread

—

165 to 172 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

—

13.2 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

3613 kgReference

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.