Compare/Massey Ferguson 595 vs Massey Ferguson 6150

Massey Ferguson 595 vs Massey Ferguson 6150

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 595 vs Massey Ferguson 6150

The Massey Ferguson 595 and the Massey Ferguson 6150 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 595 leads on rated power with 87 hp against 86 hp. Massey Ferguson 595 is the lighter machine (9,040 kg vs 9,606 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 6150 is the newer design (1995 vs 1974). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 595 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 6150 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

87 hp

86 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey FergusonReference

By 1980, Massey Ferguson model 595 tractors sold in certain markets were equipped with turbochargers.Reference

With 16.9R38 rear tires.Reference

Final drives

outboard planetaryReference

—

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

127.9 LReference

—

Engine

64.7 kWReference

—

Displacement

5.2 LReference

4.0 LReference

Bore/Stroke

114 x 127 mmReference

100 x 127 mmReference

Power

64.7 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2000Reference

2200Reference

Torque

343.1 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1300Reference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Air cleaner

—

dual dry elementReference

Coolant capacity

—

17.0 LReference

Transmission

Multi-PowerReference

DynashiftReference

Gears

8 forward and 2 reverseReference

32 forward and reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Type

partial power shiftReference

four-speed power shiftReference

Pressure

165.5 barReference

202.1 barReference

Pump flow

25.4 lpmReference

56.4 lpmReference

Rear Type

2Reference

IIReference

Control

position and draft control with top-link sensingReference

electronic draft controlReference

Rear lift

2449 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

305mm dry discReference

230mm wet discReference

Rear PTO Type

1000 (1.375)Reference

540/1000Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2000Reference

1000E@1550Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

64.1 kWReference

Hydraulic system

—

68.1 LReference

Capacity

—

68.1 LReference

Valves

—

2 to 4Reference

Rear lift (at ends)

—

5425 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

260 cmReference

254 cmReference

Weight

4490 kgReference

9606 to 10224 poundsReference

Front tire

11.00-16Reference

10.00-16Reference

Rear tire

16.9-38 (2WD)Reference

18.4R-34Reference

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 12.4-28. Rear: 16.9-38 (4WD)Reference

—

Length

446 cmReference

411 cmReference

Height (cab)

262 cmReference

269 cmReference

Ag front

—

10.00-16Reference

Ag rear

—

18.4R-34Reference

Width

—

187 cmReference

2WD Weight

—

4357 kgReference

4WD Weight

—

4637 kgReference

2WD Front tread

—

145 to 247 cmReference

4WD Front tread

—

156 to 205 cmReference

Rear tread

—

153 to 218 cmReference

Capacities

Fuel

—

160.1 LReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Batteries

—

2Reference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.