Compare/Massey Ferguson 5M.125 vs Massey Ferguson 6714S

Massey Ferguson 5M.125 vs Massey Ferguson 6714S

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 5M.125 vs Massey Ferguson 6714S

The Massey Ferguson 5M.125 and the Massey Ferguson 6714S are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 6714S leads on rated power with 126 hp against 125 hp. Massey Ferguson 5M.125 is the lighter machine (4,500 kg vs 6,999 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 6714S holds more fuel (253.6 L vs 198.0 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 5M.125 is the newer design (2025 vs 2017). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 6714S for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 5M.125 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

125 hp

126 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference

Four power shift speeds in four ranges with power shuttle.Reference

Pull at 3.52KPHReference

Differential lock

electro-hydraulicReference

electro-hydraulic front and rearReference

Trailer brakes

pneumaticReference

hydraulicReference

Engine

Fuel tank

198.0 LReference

253.6 LReference

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

18.2 LReference

29.9 LReference

Engine

89.5 kWReference

96.9 kWReference

Engine (max)

93.2 kWReference

—

Displacement

4.4 LReference

4.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

108 x 120 mmReference

108 x 134 mmReference

Emissions

Tier IVReference

Stage VReference

Power

89.5 kWReference

96.9 kWReference

Maximum Power

93.2 kWReference

104.4 kWReference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

2100Reference

Torque

520.7 NmReference

691.6 NmReference

Torque RPM

1500Reference

Starter

electricReference

Starter volts

12Reference

Drawbar (tested)

—

83.8 kWReference

Emission control

—

SCR/DEF/DOCReference

Fuel system

—

high-pressure common rail direct injectionReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

94.1 kWReference

Max power

—

83.8 kWReference

Transmission

Dyna-4Reference

Dyna-VTReference

Gears

16 forward and reverseReference

infinite forward and reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Type

four-speed power shiftReference

continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference

Pressure

200.0 barReference

Valves

2 or 3Reference

—

Pump flow

99.9 lpmReference

189.2 lpmReference

Steering flow

32.2 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIIReference

Rear lift

5200 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2000Reference

1000@1920Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

89.5 kWReference

PTO (tested)

—

94.1 kWReference

Rear valves

—

5Reference

Front valves

—

2Reference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

5100 kgReference

Clutch

—

wet discReference

Front PTO

—

independentReference

Front PTO Type

—

1000Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

98.4 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

262 cmReference

266 cmReference

Weight

4500 kgReference

6999 kgReference

Length

430 cmReference

492 cmReference

Width

179 cmReference

182 cmReference

Height (cab)

273 cmReference

302 cmReference

Ground clearance

52 cmReference

—

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Charging amps

—

240Reference

Variants

MT475E

—

similar Challenger modelReference

Test results

Fuel use

—

31.0 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

6862 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.