Compare/Massey Ferguson 6150 vs Massey Ferguson 699
Search

Massey Ferguson 6150 vs Massey Ferguson 699

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 6150 vs Massey Ferguson 699

The Massey Ferguson 6150 and the Massey Ferguson 699 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 86 hp. Massey Ferguson 699 is the lighter machine (8,304 kg vs 9,606 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 6150 is the newer design (1995 vs 1984). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Massey Ferguson 6150 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Massey Ferguson 699 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
86 hp
86 hp
Confidence
98%
98%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Massey FergusonReference
Massey FergusonReference
With 16.9R38 rear tires.Reference
Gear 2HL used for pull test.Reference
Final drives
planetaryReference
Differential lock
mechanical rearReference
Engine
Displacement
4.0 LReference
5.8 LReference
Bore/Stroke
100 x 127 mmReference
98 x 127 mmReference
Air cleaner
dual dry elementReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Coolant capacity
17.0 LReference
Fuel tank
145.0 LReference
Drawbar (tested)
51.7 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
64.0 kWReference
Max power
51.7 kWReference
Transmission
Transmission
DynashiftReference
Gears
32 forward and reverseReference
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
64.1 kWReference
63.4 kWReference
Hydraulic system
68.1 LReference
Type
four-speed power shiftReference
synchromeshReference
Capacity
68.1 LReference
Pressure
202.1 barReference
172.4 barReference
Valves
2 to 4Reference
2 or 3Reference
Pump flow
56.4 lpmReference
26.5 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
IIReference
Control
electronic draft controlReference
Rear lift (at ends)
5425 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
230mm wet discReference
dry discReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000Reference
540/1000Reference
Engine RPM
1000E@1550Reference
1000@1900Reference
PTO (tested)
64.0 kWReference
Total flow
64.3 lpmReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
2385 kgReference
Power at rated PTO speed
58.2 kWReference
Capacities
Fuel
160.1 LReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
254 cmReference
258 cmReference
Weight
9606 to 10224 poundsReference
8304 to 10325 poundsReference
Front tire
10.00-16Reference
10.00-16Reference
Rear tire
18.4R-34Reference
Ag front
10.00-16Reference
Ag rear
18.4R-34Reference
Length
411 cmReference
432 cmReference
Width
187 cmReference
205 cmReference
Height (cab)
269 cmReference
271 cmReference
2WD Weight
4357 kgReference
4WD Weight
4637 kgReference
2WD Front tread
145 to 247 cmReference
162 to 195 cmReference
4WD Front tread
156 to 205 cmReference
167 to 187 cmReference
Rear tread
153 to 218 cmReference
152 to 243 cmReference
2WD Rear tire
18.4-34Reference
2WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 18.4-34Reference
4WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 14.9-24. Rear: 18.4-34Reference
2WD ROPS Shipping
3766 kgReference
2WD Cab Shipping
4129 kgReference
4WD ROPS Shipping
4207 kgReference
4WD Cab Shipping
4570 kgReference
Operating
4683 kgReference
Ballasted
5867 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Batteries
2Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging amps
55Reference
Speeds
Variants
699
2WDReference
699-4
4WDReference
Test results
Fuel use
19.7 l/hourReference
Max pull
3954 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)