Compare/Massey Ferguson 6360 vs Massey Ferguson 8727
Search

Massey Ferguson 6360 vs Massey Ferguson 8727

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 6360 vs Massey Ferguson 8727

The Massey Ferguson 6360 and the Massey Ferguson 8727 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 6360 leads on rated power with 220 hp against 218 hp. Massey Ferguson 8727 is the newer design (2014 vs 2004). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 6360 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 8727 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Massey Ferguson 6360 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
94
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Massey Ferguson 8727 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
94
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
220 hp
218 hp
Confidence
98%
98%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference
Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Pull at 2.45KPHReference
Final drives
planetaryReference
Differential lock
electro-hydraulicReference
Engine
Engine
164.1 kWReference
179.0 kWReference
Displacement
8.3 LReference
8.4 LReference
Bore/Stroke
114 x 135 mmReference
111 x 145 mmReference
Power
164.1 kWReference
179.0 kWReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2100Reference
Torque
882.1 NmReference
Torque RPM
1500Reference
Starter type
electricReference
Fuel tank
628.3 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
59.8 LReference
Drawbar (tested)
155.9 kWReference
Emissions
Tier IVReference
Emission control
selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference
Maximum Power
201.3 kWReference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
Max power
155.9 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
162.4 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
infinite forward and reverse (2-range)Reference
Clutch
345mm dry discReference
Transmission
Dyna-VTReference
Capacities
Fuel
500.0 LReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Hydraulic system
120.0 LReference
Capacity
120.0 LReference
Pressure
210.0 barReference
200.0 barReference
Valves
3Reference
4 to 6Reference
Rear Type
IIReference
III/IVNReference
Rear lift
6999 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000Reference
1000/1000E (1.75)Reference
PTO (claimed)
152.9 kWReference
PTO (tested)
180.9 kWReference
Type
continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference
Pump flow
204.4 lpmReference
Rear lift (at ends)
11999 kgReference
Drawbar
Cat 4 (optional)Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
180.0 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
309 cmReference
309 cmReference
Front tire
18.4-26Reference
Rear tire
30.5-32Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 18.4-26. Rear: 30.5-32Reference
Optional tires (ag)
Front: 18.4-26. Rear: 24.5-32Reference
Length
562 cmReference
555 cmReference
Height
306 cmReference
Ballasted weight
11999 kgReference
Ground clearance
48 cmReference
Weight
10800 kgReference
Height (cab)
358 cmReference
Shipping weight
10800 kgReference
Bar rear axle
109 by 2997 mmReference
Electrical
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Ground
negativeReference
Charging amps
240 (twin 120A)Reference
Charging volts
12Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
Variants
MT645E
similar Challenger modelReference
Test results
Fuel use
54.1 l/hourReference
Max pull
10319 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)