Compare/Massey Ferguson 6S.135 vs Massey Ferguson 8220
Search

Massey Ferguson 6S.135 vs Massey Ferguson 8220

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 6S.135 vs Massey Ferguson 8220

The Massey Ferguson 6S.135 and the Massey Ferguson 8220 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 8220 leads on rated power with 135 hp against 134 hp. Massey Ferguson 6S.135 is the lighter machine (12,787 kg vs 14,760 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 8220 holds more fuel (408.8 L vs 280.1 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 6S.135 is the newer design (2022 vs 1999). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 8220 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 6S.135 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Massey Ferguson 6S.135 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
94
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Massey Ferguson 8220 Tractor
Massey Ferguson
94
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
134 hp
135 hp
Confidence
98%
98%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference
Massey FergusonReference
liquid-cooledReference
Gear 5 used for pull test.Reference
Original price
$75,300Reference
Engine
Fuel tank
280.1 LReference
408.8 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
35.2 LReference
Engine
100.0 kWReference
Displacement
4.9 LReference
6.0 LReference
Bore/Stroke
108 x 134 mmReference
100 x 127 mmReference
Emissions
Stage VReference
Power
100.0 kWReference
Maximum Power
111.0 kWReference
Rated RPM
1950Reference
2200Reference
Torque
648.0 NmReference
Torque RPM
1500Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Drawbar (tested)
99.6 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
16.0:1Reference
Power at rated engine speed
101.0 kWReference
Max power
99.6 kWReference
Transmission
Transmission
Dyna-VTReference
Gears
infinite forward and reverseReference
18 forward and 9 reverseReference
Clutch
wet discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Type
continuously-variable transmissionReference
full power shiftReference
Pressure
200.0 barReference
200.0 barReference
Rear valves
up to 5Reference
Front valves
up to 2Reference
Pump flow
190.0 lpmReference
147.6 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIIReference
IIIReference
Dyna-6 Rear lift
7100 kgReference
Dyna-VT Rear lift
9599 kgReference
Front Hitch
IIIReference
Front lift
3200 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
540/1000Reference
Engine RPM
1000@1920Reference
1000@2000Reference
Front PTO
independentReference
Front PTO Type
1000Reference
PTO (claimed)
100.7 kWReference
PTO (tested)
101.0 kWReference
Valves
3 or 4Reference
Rear lift (at ends)
8700 kgReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
6350 kgReference
Power at rated PTO speed
105.3 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
266 cmReference
274 cmReference
Weight
12787 to 15432 poundsReference
14760 to 15895 poundsReference
Front tire
420/85R28Reference
11.00-16Reference
Rear tire
520/85R38Reference
18.4R-38Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 420/85R28. Rear: 520/85R38Reference
Length
471 cmReference
490 cmReference
Height (cab)
302 cmReference
307 cmReference
Shipping
5800 kgReference
Ag front
11.00-16Reference
Ag rear
18.4R-38Reference
Height (exhaust)
312 cmReference
Operating weight
7209 kgReference
Clearance (drawbar)
43 cmReference
Capacities
Max capacity
12500 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
120Reference
Batteries
2Reference
Battery CCA
950Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
34.1 l/hourReference
Max pull
6670 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)