Search
Massey Ferguson 8737 vs Massey Ferguson 9S.310
Verdict: Massey Ferguson 8737 vs Massey Ferguson 9S.310
The Massey Ferguson 8737 and the Massey Ferguson 9S.310 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 9S.310 leads on rated power with 310 hp against 305 hp. Massey Ferguson 9S.310 holds more fuel (660.1 L vs 628.3 L) for longer stints between fills. Massey Ferguson 9S.310 is the newer design (2024 vs 2014). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 9S.310 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 8737 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Massey Ferguson
71
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
305 hp
310 hp
Confidence
98%
98%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference
Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference
Pull at 2.55KPHReference
liquid-cooledReference
Differential lock
electro-hydraulicReference
—
Variants
MT685E
similar Challenger modelReference
—
Engine
Fuel tank
628.3 LReference
660.1 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
59.8 LReference
68.1 LReference
Engine
253.5 kWReference
231.2 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
201.2 kWReference
—
Displacement
8.4 LReference
8.4 LReference
Bore/Stroke
111 x 145 mmReference
111 x 145 mmReference
Emissions
Tier IVReference
Stage VReference
Emission control
selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference
—
Power
253.5 kWReference
231.2 kWReference
Maximum Power
275.9 kWReference
253.5 kWReference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
—
Starter
electricReference
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Max power
201.2 kWReference
—
Power at rated engine speed
227.3 kWReference
—
Torque
—
1350.6 NmReference
Torque RPM
—
1500Reference
Transmission
Transmission
Dyna-VTReference
Dyna-VTReference
Gears
infinite forward and reverse (2-range)Reference
infinite forward and reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
216.3 kWReference
—
PTO (tested)
243.4 kWReference
—
Type
continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference
continuously variable transmissionReference
Pressure
200.0 barReference
200.0 barReference
Valves
4 to 6Reference
—
Pump flow
204.4 lpmReference
400.1 lpmReference
Rear Type
III/IVNReference
IV/IIIReference
Rear lift (at ends)
11999 kgReference
11999 kgReference
Drawbar
Cat 4 (optional)Reference
—
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000/1000E (1.75)Reference
1000 (1.75)Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
234.7 kWReference
—
Rear valves
—
6Reference
Front valves
—
1 or 2Reference
Engine RPM
—
1000@2036Reference
Front PTO
—
independentReference
Front PTO Type
—
1000Reference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
309 cmReference
310 cmReference
Weight
10800 kgReference
—
Length
555 cmReference
560 cmReference
Height (cab)
358 cmReference
—
Shipping weight
10800 kgReference
—
Bar rear axle
109 by 2997 mmReference
—
Front tire
—
600/70R30Reference
Rear tire
—
650/85R38Reference
Standard tires (ag)
—
Front: 600/70R30. Rear: 650/85R38Reference
Optional tires (ag)
—
Front: 710/55R34. Rear: 900/40R42Reference
Height
—
341 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
240 (twin 120A)Reference
—
Charging volts
12Reference
—
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
65.9 l/hourReference
—
Max pull
9922 kgReference
—
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.