Compare/Massey Ferguson 8S.245 vs Massey Ferguson 9240

Massey Ferguson 8S.245 vs Massey Ferguson 9240

Verdict: Massey Ferguson 8S.245 vs Massey Ferguson 9240

The Massey Ferguson 8S.245 and the Massey Ferguson 9240 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Massey Ferguson 8S.245 leads on rated power with 213 hp against 210 hp. Massey Ferguson 9240 is the lighter machine (9,013 kg vs 19,180 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Massey Ferguson 8S.245 is the newer design (2020 vs 1995). In short: choose the Massey Ferguson 8S.245 for outright pulling power, or the Massey Ferguson 9240 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

213 hp

210 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference

Massey FergusonReference

liquid-cooledReference

Gear 8 used for power test.Reference

Differential lock

automatic front and rearReference

—

Trailer brakes

hydraulicReference

—

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

Fuel tank

499.6 LReference

—

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

43.1 LReference

—

Engine

180.0 kWReference

—

Displacement

7.4 LReference

8.3 LReference

Bore/Stroke

108 x 134 mmReference

114 x 135 mmReference

Emissions

Stage 5Reference

—

Power

180.0 kWReference

—

Maximum Power

194.9 kWReference

—

Fuel system

common railReference

—

Rated RPM

1850Reference

2200Reference

Torque

1100.1 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1500Reference

—

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Drawbar (tested)

—

130.9 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

—

16.5:1Reference

Max power

—

130.9 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

156.3 kWReference

Transmission

Dyna-VTReference

—

Gears

infinite forward and reverseReference

18 forward and 9 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

159.0 kWReference

—

Type

continuously-variable transmissionReference

full powershiftReference

Pressure

200.0 barReference

—

Rear valves

5Reference

—

Front valves

2Reference

—

Pump flow

205.1 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIIReference

Control

position and draft controlReference

—

Rear lift (at ends)

10000 kgReference

—

Front lift

4799 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

—

Rear PTO Type

1000 (1.75)Reference

1000Reference

Engine RPM

1000@1920Reference

—

Front PTO

independentReference

—

Front PTO Type

1000Reference

—

PTO (tested)

—

168.8 kWReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

163.4 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

305 cmReference

292 cmReference

Weight

19180 to 22046 poundsReference

9013 kgReference

Front tire

540/65R30Reference

—

Rear tire

650/65R42Reference

—

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 540/65R30. Rear: 650/65R42Reference

—

Optional tires (ag)

Front: 720/55R30. Rear: 900/50R42Reference

—

Length

537 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

341 cmReference

—

Shipping

8700 kgReference

—

Operating

10000 kgReference

—

Operating weight

—

9013 kgReference

Ballasted weight

—

10242 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

—

Charging system

alternatorReference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

—

Capacities

Max capacity

13700 kgReference

—

Test results

Fuel use

—

49.2 l/hourReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.