Compare/McCormick Intl C90 vs McCormick Intl X4.60

McCormick Intl C90 vs McCormick Intl X4.60

Verdict: McCormick Intl C90 vs McCormick Intl X4.60

The McCormick Intl C90 and the McCormick Intl X4.60 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. McCormick Intl C90 leads on rated power with 80 hp against 79 hp. McCormick Intl X4.60 is the lighter machine (3,193 kg vs 5,964 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl X4.60 is the newer design (2014 vs 2001). In short: choose the McCormick Intl C90 for outright pulling power, or the McCormick Intl X4.60 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

80 hp

79 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference

With 16.9-30 rear tires.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Differential lock

—

mechanical optionalReference

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Trailer brakes

—

pneumatic (optional)Reference

Engine

Fuel tank

120.0 LReference

—

Engine

67.1 kWReference

70.8 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

51.6 kWReference

—

Displacement

4.0 LReference

3.6 LReference

Bore/Stroke

100 x 127 mmReference

97 x 119 mmReference

Power

67.1 kWReference

70.8 kWReference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Torque

355.0 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1400Reference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Power at rated engine speed

59.4 kWReference

—

Max power

51.6 kWReference

—

Emissions

—

Tier 4Reference

Maximum Power

—

73.8 kWReference

Compression

—

17.2:1Reference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

Gears

16 forward and 8 reverseReference

24 forward and reverseReference

Clutch

dry discReference

wet discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

55.2 kWReference

63.4 kWReference

PTO (tested)

59.4 kWReference

—

Type

two-speed power shiftReference

wet discReference

Pressure

172.4 barReference

—

Pump flow

58.7 lpmReference

56.8 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

—

Rear lift

2311 kgReference

3891 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

540/1000Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2000Reference

—

Power at rated PTO speed

60.5 kWReference

—

Valves

—

2 to 4Reference

Total flow

—

88.9 lpmReference

Control

—

position controlReference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

214 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

223 cmReference

—

Weight

5964 to 6692 poundsReference

3193 kgReference

Front tire

11.00-16Reference

—

2WD Rear tire

18.4-30Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 11.00-16. Rear: 18.4-30Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 18.4-30Reference

—

2WD Shipping weight

2705 kgReference

—

4WD Shipping weight

3035 kgReference

—

Wheelbase

—

223 cmReference

Length

—

431 cmReference

Width

—

175 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

259 cmReference

Ground clearance

—

36 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

18.2 l/hourReference

—

Max pull

4182 kgReference

—

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.