Compare/McCormick Intl C90 vs McCormick Intl X50.30

McCormick Intl C90 vs McCormick Intl X50.30

Verdict: McCormick Intl C90 vs McCormick Intl X50.30

The McCormick Intl C90 and the McCormick Intl X50.30 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. McCormick Intl X50.30 leads on rated power with 82 hp against 80 hp. McCormick Intl C90 is the lighter machine (5,964 kg vs 8,030 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl C90 holds more fuel (120.0 L vs 102.2 L) for longer stints between fills. McCormick Intl X50.30 is the newer design (2012 vs 2001). In short: choose the McCormick Intl X50.30 for outright pulling power, or the McCormick Intl C90 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

80 hp

82 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference

With 16.9-30 rear tires.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

Fuel tank

120.0 LReference

102.2 LReference

Engine

67.1 kWReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

51.6 kWReference

—

Displacement

4.0 LReference

3.4 LReference

Bore/Stroke

100 x 127 mmReference

99 x 110 mmReference

Power

67.1 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Torque

355.0 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1400Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Power at rated engine speed

59.4 kWReference

—

Max power

51.6 kWReference

—

Emissions

—

Interim Tier 4Reference

Emission control

—

exhaust gas recirculation (EGR)Reference

Maximum Power

—

76.1 kWReference

Fuel system

—

direct injectionReference

Air cleaner

—

dryReference

Compression

—

17:1Reference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

Gears

16 forward and 8 reverseReference

32 forward and 12 reverseReference

Clutch

dry discReference

wet discsReference

Transmission

—

XtraspeedReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

55.2 kWReference

64.5 kWReference

PTO (tested)

59.4 kWReference

—

Type

two-speed power shiftReference

three-speed power shift with power shuttleReference

Pressure

172.4 barReference

—

Pump flow

58.7 lpmReference

52.2 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

Rear lift

2311 kgReference

4740 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

540/750/1000Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2000Reference

—

Power at rated PTO speed

60.5 kWReference

—

Valves

—

2 to 4Reference

Total flow

—

81.8 lpmReference

Control

—

position and draft controlReference

Front Hitch

—

optionalReference

Front lift

—

1796 kgReference

Front PTO

—

independent (optional)Reference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

214 cmReference

236 cmReference

4WD Wheelbase

223 cmReference

233 cmReference

Weight

5964 to 6692 poundsReference

3841 kgReference

Front tire

11.00-16Reference

380/70R24Reference

2WD Rear tire

18.4-30Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 11.00-16. Rear: 18.4-30Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 18.4-30Reference

—

2WD Shipping weight

2705 kgReference

—

4WD Shipping weight

3035 kgReference

—

Rear tire

—

480/70R34Reference

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 380/70R24. Rear: 480/70R34Reference

Length

—

416 cmReference

Width

—

210 cmReference

Height (ROPS)

—

255 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

256 cmReference

Ground clearance

—

46 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

18.2 l/hourReference

—

Max pull

4182 kgReference

—

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.