Compare/McCormick Intl CX105 vs McCormick Intl MC130

McCormick Intl CX105 vs McCormick Intl MC130

Verdict: McCormick Intl CX105 vs McCormick Intl MC130

The McCormick Intl CX105 and the McCormick Intl MC130 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. McCormick Intl CX105 leads on rated power with 102 hp against 101 hp. McCormick Intl CX105 is the lighter machine (3,755 kg vs 4,844 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl MC130 is the newer design (2008 vs 2003). In short: choose the McCormick Intl CX105 for outright pulling power, or the McCormick Intl MC130 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

102 hp

101 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

McCormick IntlReference

McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference

Four gears in two ranges with two-speed power shift.Reference

Four power shift gears in four ranges with power shuttle. Optional AutoSpeed offers push-button shifting and programmable gear selection.Reference

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Final drives

—

electro-hydraulic rearReference

Engine

Engine (net)

76.1 kWReference

—

Engine

76.1 kWReference

92.5 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

55.2 kWReference

—

Displacement

4.4 LReference

Bore/Stroke

105 x 127 mmReference

Emissions

Tier IIReference

Tier 3Reference

Rated Power (net)

76.1 kWReference

—

Compression

17.25:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Torque

402.1 NmReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Power

76.1 kWReference

92.5 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

64.3 kWReference

—

Max power

55.2 kWReference

—

Fuel tank

—

196.1 LReference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

XtrashiftReference

—

Gears

16 forward and 8 reverseReference

16 forward and 12 reverseReference

Clutch

dry discReference

electro-hydraulic wet discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

61.9 kWReference

75.5 kWReference

PTO (tested)

64.3 kWReference

—

Hydraulic system

36.7 LReference

—

Type

synchro shuttleReference

four-speed power shiftReference

Capacity

36.7 LReference

—

Pump flow

60.0 lpmReference

109.0 lpmReference

Rear lift

3875 kgReference

5870 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2000Reference

—

Power at rated PTO speed

65.0 kWReference

—

Valves

—

2 or 3Reference

Rear Type

—

IIINReference

Capacities

Fuel

155.2 LReference

—

Dimensions

Wheelbase

235 cmReference

251 cmReference

Weight

3755 kgReference

4844 kgReference

Front tire

10.00-16Reference

380/85R28Reference

Rear tire

16.9R34Reference

460/85R38Reference

Ag front

12.4R24 (4WD)Reference

—

Ag rear

16.9R34Reference

—

Length

421 cmReference

442 cmReference

Height

274 cmReference

—

Operating weight

3755 kgReference

—

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 380/85R28. Rear: 460/85R38Reference

Width

—

230 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

259 cmReference

Shipping weight

—

4844 kgReference

Clearance (drawbar)

—

38 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

65Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

21.2 l/hourReference

—

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.