Compare/McCormick Intl CX50 vs McCormick Intl MB55
Search

McCormick Intl CX50 vs McCormick Intl MB55

Verdict: McCormick Intl CX50 vs McCormick Intl MB55

The McCormick Intl CX50 and the McCormick Intl MB55 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. McCormick Intl MB55 leads on rated power with 54 hp against 53 hp. McCormick Intl MB55 is the lighter machine (2,424 kg vs 7,132 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl CX50 holds more fuel (155.2 L vs 87.1 L) for longer stints between fills. McCormick Intl MB55 is the newer design (2006 vs 2000). In short: choose the McCormick Intl MB55 for outright pulling power, or the McCormick Intl CX50 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
McCormick Intl CX50 Tractor
McCormick Intl
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
McCormick Intl MB55 Tractor
McCormick Intl
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
53 hp
54 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference
McCormick IntlReference
liquid-cooledReference
liquid-cooledReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
Engine
Fuel tank
155.2 LReference
87.1 LReference
Engine
39.5 kWReference
43.3 kWReference
Displacement
2.7 LReference
3.3 LReference
Bore/Stroke
95 x 127 mmReference
105 x 127 mmReference
Power
39.5 kWReference
43.3 kWReference
Rated RPM
2250Reference
2200Reference
Torque
177.0 NmReference
221.7 NmReference
Torque RPM
1200Reference
1400Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
Compression
19.25:1Reference
Transmission
Gears
16 forward and 8 reverseReference
24 forward and 12 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Type
two-speed power shiftReference
SCV flow
53.0 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
IIReference
Rear lift
2039 kgReference
3692 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
304mm dry discReference
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540Reference
Engine RPM
540@1954Reference
PTO (claimed)
40.3 kWReference
Pressure
179.3 barReference
Valves
1 or 2Reference
Pump flow
52.2 lpmReference
Total flow
72.7 lpmReference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
215 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
221 cmReference
Weight
7132 to 7815 poundsReference
2424 kgReference
Front tire
6.00-16Reference
7.50-16Reference
2WD Rear tire
12.4R32Reference
2WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 6.00-16. Rear: 12.4R32Reference
4WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 8.3R24. Rear: 12.4R32Reference
Length
406 cmReference
323 cmReference
Width
214 cmReference
167 cmReference
2WD Weight
3235 kgReference
4WD Weight
3544 kgReference
Wheelbase
212 cmReference
Rear tire
14.9R28Reference
Ag front
7.50-16Reference
Ag rear
14.9R28Reference
Height (steering wheel)
169 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
241 cmReference
Ground clearance
35 cmReference
Front tread
132 to 181 cmReference
Rear tread
130 to 189 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Battery volts
12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)